DOJ files lawsuit against Harvard for withholding admissions data

The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a federal lawsuit against Harvard University, accusing it of unlawfully withholding detailed admissions data needed for a compliance review. The action follows the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling that ended race-conscious admissions practices. The suit seeks to enforce transparency without alleging current discrimination.

The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division initiated the lawsuit on Friday, marking an escalation in efforts to oversee university admissions after the 2023 Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard. That ruling struck down race-based admissions, prompting federal reviews to ensure compliance.

The dispute began in April 2025, when the DOJ started compliance examinations of Harvard's undergraduate college, law school, and medical school. It requested five years of individualized applicant data, including SAT, ACT, MCAT, and LSAT scores; GPAs; extracurricular activities; and essays, broken down by race and ethnicity. Officials stated this information is essential to detect any use of "race-neutral" methods that might still achieve unconstitutional "racial balancing."

According to the complaint, Harvard delayed the process for over ten months, providing more than 2,000 pages of documents—mostly publicly available items like financial aid brochures and summary statistics. The university missed several extended deadlines, with the last significant submission in May 2025.

"Harvard has failed to disclose the data we need to ensure that its admissions are free of discrimination," Attorney General Pamela Bondi said. "We will continue fighting to put merit over DEI across America."

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon added, "If Harvard has stopped discriminating, it should happily share the data necessary to prove it."

Harvard, with a $56.9 billion endowment, receives substantial federal support, including $686 million in research grants in 2024 and over $2.6 billion in total assistance planned. This subjects it to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, requiring record access for anti-discrimination checks. The 2023 SFFA ruling highlighted how Harvard's prior system reduced Asian American admissions and relied on a "pernicious stereotype" in racial considerations.

The DOJ specifically wants "searchable electronic spreadsheets" to analyze qualifications of admitted and rejected applicants by racial groups. Harvard maintains its admissions are holistic and lawful, with acceptance rates of 4.2% for undergraduates and 3.2% for medical school.

The suit does not seek damages or fund cuts but asks the court to rule Harvard in violation of its obligations and order document release. Experts note it may influence future federal demands for university transparency post-affirmative action.

Related Articles

Federal judge in Boston courtroom grants injunction blocking Trump administration's race data order for universities, as state attorneys general celebrate.
Image generated by AI

Federal judge blocks Trump administration’s order requiring public universities in 17 states to submit race-related admissions data

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

A federal judge in Boston granted a preliminary injunction Friday blocking the Trump administration from enforcing a new requirement that public universities submit detailed admissions data to show they are not considering race, after a lawsuit brought by 17 Democratic state attorneys general.

The U.S. Justice Department moved on Wednesday, January 28, 2026, to join a federal lawsuit accusing UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine of unlawfully considering race in admissions, an allegation the school disputes. The filing comes as the Trump administration intensifies scrutiny of race-conscious decision-making in higher education and follows the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling limiting the use of race in college admissions.

Reported by AI Fact checked

Tufts University has paused publication of its widely used National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement reports after the U.S. Department of Education opened an investigation into whether the project’s data-matching practices violate federal student privacy law. The department has also warned participating colleges that using new NSLVE data could put their federal funding at risk.

The U.S. Department of Justice released more than 3 million additional pages, along with thousands of images and videos, related to Jeffrey Epstein on January 30, 2026, claiming full compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The files include unverified public submissions to the FBI, some containing false claims against President Donald Trump from before the 2020 election. Officials emphasized that mentions of notable figures do not imply wrongdoing.

Reported by AI

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has agreed to provide raw climate risk datasets to plaintiffs following a lawsuit by environmental and agricultural groups. This settlement ensures public access to the data even if online tools are removed in the future. The action stems from efforts to restore resources deleted after the Trump administration took office.

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline