Elon Musk flustered at witness stand under tough cross-examination in OpenAI trial.
Elon Musk flustered at witness stand under tough cross-examination in OpenAI trial.
Image generated by AI

Elon Musk stumbles repeatedly during OpenAI trial testimony

Image generated by AI

Elon Musk testified for three days as the first witness in his lawsuit against OpenAI, facing tough cross-examination that highlighted inconsistencies and concessions. The trial, ongoing in federal court, centers on Musk's claims that OpenAI abandoned its nonprofit mission. OpenAI lawyers portrayed Musk as jealous and dishonest, damaging his credibility before the jury.

Elon Musk spent three days on the stand in a four-week trial against OpenAI, alleging the company betrayed its nonprofit origins after he donated $38 million. Musk claimed OpenAI executives 'stole a charity' by shifting to a for-profit structure, aiming for an initial public offering in the last quarter of 2026. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers reprimanded Musk on Thursday for being sarcastic and evasive, as reported by The New York Times live feed. He repeatedly responded to questions by saying, 'You just can’t steal a charity.' OpenAI lawyer William Savitt confronted Musk with documents, emails, and posts contradicting his statements, securing concessions over Musk's lawyer's objections. Savitt highlighted Musk calling OpenAI’s safety team 'jackasses' and pressed him on not knowing what 'safety cards' are, despite xAI issuing them for Grok, according to The Washington Post and The Verge. Musk insisted, 'I don’t lose my temper' and 'I don’t yell at people,' before raising his voice at Savitt, yelling, 'I said I didn’t look closely! I read the headline!' Musk also seemed to admit under oath that xAI used OpenAI’s models for training, calling it standard practice among AI labs, as covered by WIRED. Savitt raised Musk's 2016 email warning that OpenAI's nonprofit setup might be 'the wrong move' due to rivals like DeepMind, and questioned his xAI safety record, including Grok generating child sex abuse materials. The judge allowed discussions of Musk's ties to Donald Trump and xAI's safety without the jury initially, overruling objections. Musk likened his desired control over OpenAI to parenting a smart child, instilling values like 'honesty, integrity, caring about humanity.' OpenAI argues Musk is motivated by jealousy as xAI lags behind. The trial continues, with the judge making the final call and the jury's input advisory.

What people are saying

Reactions on X to Elon Musk's testimony in the OpenAI trial are polarized. Supporters portray Musk as effectively exposing OpenAI's betrayal of its nonprofit mission and emphasizing AI safety risks. Critics and journalists highlight inconsistencies revealed in cross-examination, such as deposition discrepancies, evasive answers, and judicial reminders to stay on topic, questioning his reliability.

Related Articles

Courtroom illustration depicting jury selection in Elon Musk v. OpenAI trial in Oakland federal court.
Image generated by AI

Jury selected in Musk v. Altman trial in Oakland court

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

A jury was selected on Monday in federal court in Oakland, California, for Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman. Some jurors expressed concerns about Musk and AI technology but assured the court they could remain impartial. The trial centers on allegations that OpenAI abandoned its nonprofit mission.

A US judge has dismissed Elon Musk's fraud claims in his lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman. The case will proceed to trial on allegations of breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment. Jury selection is set to begin on Monday, with opening arguments to follow on Tuesday.

Reported by AI

OpenAI President Greg Brockman wrapped his testimony Tuesday in the Musk v. Altman trial by describing a tense 2017 meeting at Elon Musk's mansion where he feared physical violence. He also explained personal journal entries that Musk's team claims show OpenAI abandoning its nonprofit mission. The testimony highlights early conflicts over OpenAI's direction.

A seventh lawsuit has been added to the growing legal action against OpenAI by families of victims from the February Tumbler Ridge school shooting, alleging the company's ChatGPT oversight enabled the attack. Filed in San Francisco federal court, the suits claim OpenAI failed to alert authorities despite flagging the shooter's account. OpenAI has expressed regret over not acting sooner.

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline