Slate podcast outlines bold Democratic agenda against Trump precedents

In a recent Slate Plus episode of Amicus, legal experts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss strategies for a future Democratic president to repair damage from a potential Trump administration. They argue for using expanded executive powers granted by the Supreme Court to undo harms like mass deportations and agency purges. The conversation emphasizes aggressive action on day one to restore norms and democracy.

The episode, part of the 'Dear (Juris)Prudence' series, responds to listener Jacob Garcowski's question about national recovery after a 2028 Democratic victory, despite a conservative Supreme Court. Published on December 26, 2025, it features Stern advocating for a 'maximalist vision of executive power' established under Trump.

Stern suggests that a hypothetical President AOC in 2029 should immediately impound the budget of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), firing tens of thousands of agents, particularly those involved in violence and discrimination. He proposes closing immigrant detention facilities and freeing detainees. Similarly, for Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Stern calls for firing chief Greg Bovino and agents linked to operations in Chicago, Washington D.C., and Los Angeles, while refusing benefits to law-breakers and releasing participant names.

Repurposed funds would create a reparations program via executive order, compensating victims of deportations and aiding returns of wrongly removed noncitizens. ICE and CBP headquarters could become a 'Truth and Reconciliation Agency' to handle damages from mass deportation campaigns. Stern notes these actions would be '100 percent legal under the precedent established by Trump and the Supreme Court,' citing rulings allowing fund impoundment and agency abolition.

Beyond immigration, the plan includes purging Trump appointees from agencies like the Federal Trade Commission and National Labor Relations Board, and removing Trump's branding from institutions such as the Kennedy Center. Addressing potential Supreme Court challenges, Stern argues litigation would take years, allowing time to 'run out the clock.'

On norms, Lithwick and Stern warn against unilateral adherence, quoting Stern: 'You cannot bring a shrimp fork to a knife fight.' They assert Democrats must demonstrate consequences to Republicans by wielding the same powers, fostering mutual respect for democratic guardrails to prevent further erosion.

Related Articles

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court building with podcast elements and tariff documents, symbolizing a podcast episode on legal challenges to Trump administration policies.
Image generated by AI

Amicus episode spotlights lower-court pushback and a looming Supreme Court tariff fight

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

In a Nov. 1, 2025 episode of Slate’s Amicus, host Dahlia Lithwick examines how lower federal courts are confronting key Trump administration moves—on due process and domestic deployments—and previews this week’s Supreme Court arguments over the president’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. According to Slate, the episode also features Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources, a lead plaintiff in the tariff challenge.

In 2025, the US Supreme Court's conservative supermajority repeatedly supported President Donald Trump's expansive agenda, clearing paths for executive actions on immigration, the economy, and electoral power. This alignment, often without explanation via the shadow docket, raised questions about the court's role in democracy. Legal analysts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the implications in a year-end podcast, highlighting the focus on voting rights cases.

Reported by AI Fact checked

A February 28, 2026 episode of Slate’s legal podcast Amicus features former U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. in conversation with host Dahlia Lithwick about the Supreme Court’s tariff dispute and broader questions about executive power, including what the episode describes as the Justice Department’s shifting relationship with facts.

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro accused federal immigration enforcement of lacking a legitimate purpose, claiming it only serves to infringe on constitutional rights. Speaking on ABC's 'The View,' the potential 2028 Democratic contender vowed to challenge such operations in his state through legal means. His remarks came amid a deadly incident involving Border Patrol in Minneapolis.

Reported by AI

In a re-aired podcast episode, union leader Sara Nelson discusses how organized labor could challenge the Trump administration’s policies. The conversation highlights unions’ unified response to actions on immigration and federal workforce reductions. Originally from April, the episode underscores labor’s potential as a counterweight in 2025.

President Donald Trump suggested Republicans should nationalize voting in certain states to counter perceived election fraud, drawing sharp criticism from Democratic leaders who accused him of plotting to steal the 2026 midterms. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Adam Schiff labeled the idea an attempt to subvert elections, despite their past support for similar federal election reforms. The comments come amid Republican concerns over midterm losses.

Reported by AI

NewsNation anchor Chris Cuomo has advised Democrats against pursuing another impeachment of President Donald Trump, even if they gain congressional control in the 2026 midterms. He argued that such efforts would fail without sufficient votes for removal and only divide the country further. This comes amid some Democrats already introducing impeachment articles.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline