Illustration of a concerned family affected by potential changes in special education oversight, with symbolic elements of dismantling federal education structures.
Image generated by AI

Trump administration moves to shift special-education oversight; Slate podcast examines potential fallout

Image generated by AI
Fact checked

The Trump administration’s push to dismantle the Education Department and reassign key functions has raised alarms among families of children with disabilities. A recent episode of Slate’s What Next podcast explores what reduced federal oversight could mean for students and parents.

Children with disabilities have a legally mandated place in public schools under federal law, but their support has often depended on robust federal oversight. In 2025, the Trump administration accelerated efforts to shrink and reorganize the U.S. Department of Education, including exploring a transfer of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act program to another federal agency and laying off staff who help monitor compliance. Administration plans and court actions this year have focused on redistributing student-loan operations and special-education oversight to other agencies such as the Small Business Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services, while critics warn of disruption to services and enforcement. The Education Department also shed staff in the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services amid a broader downsizing, intensifying concerns about accountability. (apnews.com)

In a November 10, 2025, episode of Slate’s What Next podcast titled “Is Special Ed Getting Shut Down, Too?,” host Mary Harris examines the ramifications of the administration’s moves for students with disabilities and their families. The episode focuses on how targeting the department that oversees special education could affect services in schools nationwide. (podcasts.apple.com)

Guest Pepper Stetler, author of “A Measure of Intelligence: One Mother’s Reckoning with the IQ Test” and a professor at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, discusses the challenges parents face navigating special-education services and the historic fragility of supports for disabled students. (podcasts.apple.com)

Podcast production is credited to Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme, and Rob Gunther. What Next is Slate’s daily news podcast, with new episodes released on weekday mornings. (podcasts.apple.com)

What people are saying

Discussions on X highlight widespread concern among parents, educators, and advocates about the Trump administration's plan to shift special education oversight to states by dismantling parts of the Department of Education, potentially reducing federal protections for children with disabilities. Senator Elizabeth Warren criticizes the move as a denial of equal education opportunities, calling it staggering cruelty. Some users defend the policy, arguing it redirects funds to states via block grants without actual cuts. The Slate podcast episode is frequently shared, exploring the potential negative impacts on students and families. Skeptical voices question the effectiveness of state-level enforcement.

Related Articles

Disability rights advocates protest outside the U.S. Department of Education, warning of weakened special education oversight from Trump-era staff cuts.
Image generated by AI

Advocates warn of weakened special education oversight under Trump-era cuts

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

As the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) approaches its 50th anniversary, disability rights advocates warn of a crisis in federal oversight, citing Trump-era staff reductions and policy shifts at the U.S. Department of Education’s civil rights and special education offices. They worry that weakened enforcement could erode protections that ended the widespread exclusion of children with disabilities from public schools.

A new episode of Slate's What Next podcast examines the potential for a Democratic surge in the 2026 midterm elections amid Donald Trump's second term. Hosted by Mary Harris, the discussion questions whether Democrats can achieve historic gains despite historical trends favoring the opposition party.

Reported by AI

In a recent Slate Plus episode of Amicus, legal experts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss strategies for a future Democratic president to repair damage from a potential Trump administration. They argue for using expanded executive powers granted by the Supreme Court to undo harms like mass deportations and agency purges. The conversation emphasizes aggressive action on day one to restore norms and democracy.

School choice advocate Erika Donalds, wife of Congressman Byron Donalds, discussed education reform in an interview at Turning Point USA's 2025 AmFest. She praised President Trump's plans to dismantle the Department of Education and expand parental control. Donalds also highlighted the potential benefits of artificial intelligence in classrooms with proper safeguards.

Reported by AI Fact checked

Slate’s daily news podcast What Next released an episode on Nov. 12, 2025, challenging a New York Times opinion headline that asked whether women had “ruined” the workplace. Host Mary Harris contrasts the backlash to feminism with Beyoncé’s high-profile feminist imagery and speaks with NPR political correspondent Danielle Kurtzleben.

The Trump administration has proposed a "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education" that offers preferential access to federal resources for universities that adopt a series of policy changes. Most of the nine institutions initially approached have publicly declined, with some faculty and lawmakers calling the plan “extortion,” even as public confidence in higher education continues to wane.

Reported by AI Fact checked

Recent National Assessment of Educational Progress results show American students continuing to post some of their lowest reading and math scores in decades. In an interview with The Daily Wire’s Morning Wire podcast, Nicole Nealy, president of Parents Defending Education, argued that diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, including ethnic studies programs and teacher trainings, are diverting time and resources from core academics.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline