Attorney general deems Jokowi's examination irrelevant in Pertamina oil corruption trial

Indonesia's Attorney General's Office has deemed former Pertamina commissioner Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, or Ahok's, suggestion to examine President Joko Widodo as a witness in the Pertamina crude oil corruption trial irrelevant. Ahok's testimony is seen as shedding light on long-standing mismanagement in the state energy firm. Observers urge prosecutors to pursue the case to its intellectual perpetrators.

The trial for alleged corruption in the trading of crude oil and its derivatives at PT Pertamina (Persero) took place at the Jakarta Central Corruption Court on Tuesday, January 27, 2026. Former Pertamina Chief Commissioner for 2019-2024, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama alias Ahok, testified as a witness. Ahok arrived at the court around 9:00 AM WIB wearing a long-sleeved blue batik shirt and greeted reporters. "Yes, we will convey what it is," he said, affirming he would provide honest testimony without special preparation, carrying only his smartphone with materials.

Ahok's testimony was viewed by prosecution observer Fajar Trio as a breakthrough in uncovering the chaos in national energy management from 2013 to 2024. It aligns with prior witnesses, such as former Pertamina CEO Nicke Widyawati and former ESDM Deputy Minister Arcandra Tahar. "What Ahok conveyed in the trial is the final puzzle piece that clarifies the big picture of maladministration and massive potential state losses within Pertamina. The synchronization of statements between Ahok, Nicke Widyawati, and Arcandra Tahar shows that these governance deviations occurred collectively and structured from upstream to downstream sectors," Fajar said in Jakarta on Friday, January 30, 2026.

Fajar described the testimony as a death knell for the oil mafia, highlighting inefficiencies in crude oil imports and contracts with Joint Operating Body Contractors (KKKS) that lack transparency. He urged the Attorney General's Office to pursue intellectual actors, designate new suspects, and seize assets to recover state losses over 11 years.

Post-trial, Ahok hinted at the possibility of examining President Joko Widodo as a witness regarding presidential responsibilities. However, Kejagung's Director of Prosecution for Special Crimes, Riono Budi Santoso, dismissed it. "Yes, its relevance, we see it's not relevant, right," he said on January 31, 2026. Riono emphasized no legal basis links Jokowi to the 2018-2023 case, and the president's name does not appear in witness examination records (BAP), including Ahok's. Nonetheless, he did not rule out summoning anyone if requested by the judges for evidence.

Relaterede artikler

Courtroom illustration depicting lawyers defending former Pertamina CEO Yoki Firnandi in corruption trial, highlighting non-involvement and company profits.
Billede genereret af AI

Lawyers claim yoki firnandi uninvolved in pertamina corruption case

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

In a corruption trial at Jakarta's Tipikor Court, lawyers for Yoki Firnandi, former CEO of PT Pertamina International Shipping, asserted that their client was not involved in ship procurement or crude oil exports. Witnesses confirmed no intervention from Yoki, while the company achieved significant profits under his leadership. A related ship owner stated that Pertamina benefited greatly from below-market rental rates.

The Jakarta Corruption Court held a hearing on alleged corruption in PT Pertamina's crude oil management on January 20, 2026, summoning nine witnesses including high-profile former officials like Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok) and Ignasius Jonan. The trial involves nine defendants, with Muhammad Kerry Andrianto Riza accused of self-enrichment of Rp3.07 trillion and causing state losses of Rp285.18 trillion. Witnesses are asked to explain Pertamina's governance during their tenures.

Rapporteret af AI

A criminal law expert from Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Hibnu Nugroho, believes the Attorney General's Office should take over the investigation into alleged corruption in mining permits in Konawe Utara, which KPK halted via SP3. He argues this is necessary due to significant state losses and signs of external intervention. The takeover is legally unproblematic if driven by public demand.

Finance Minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa pledged legal assistance for tax officials named suspects in the KPK's January 2026 tax bribery sting, while emphasizing no interference in the probe. This follows January 13 raids on tax authority offices and a mining firm's site.

Rapporteret af AI

Prosecutors state former Education Minister Nadiem Anwar Makarim received Rp809.59 billion related to alleged corruption in Chromebook laptop procurement. His legal counsel denies this, calling the transaction a pure internal corporate matter and noting Nadiem's wealth dropped 51 percent during his tenure. A legal expert emphasizes that negligence can still lead to criminal charges if it causes state financial loss.

As the first trial in the Chromebook corruption case looms on December 23, 2025, Nadiem Makarim's lawyer insists the former minister is still recovering from surgery and cannot attend, clashing with the Attorney General's Office claim that he is healthy. This uncertainty clouds proceedings at the Jakarta Corruption Court.

Rapporteret af AI

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) regards the alleged corruption case of Lampung Tengah Regent Ardito Wijaya as reflecting weaknesses in political party cadre recruitment. The weak cadre system fuels political donations and high campaign costs in the 2024 regional elections. This burdens regional leaders to recoup funds through corruption.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis