Grammarly disables AI expert review feature amid lawsuit

Superhuman, the company behind writing tool Grammarly, has disabled its Expert Review feature following complaints and a class action lawsuit. The tool used AI to generate writing feedback attributed to famous authors and academics without their consent. CEO Shishir Mehrotra announced the shutdown on March 11, 2026.

Superhuman launched the Expert Review feature for Grammarly in August, allowing users to receive AI-generated feedback on their writing that appeared to come from notable figures such as scientific minds, bestselling fiction authors, and tech bloggers. These suggestions were based on "publicly available information from third-party LLMs," according to the company. The feature included experts both living and deceased, with their names displayed without permission or knowledge.

Grammarly included a disclaimer stating, "References to experts in this product are for informational purposes only and do not indicate any affiliation with Grammarly or endorsement by those individuals or entities."

The tool drew criticism from living writers, leading to an attempted class action lawsuit against Superhuman. In response, the company initially offered an opt-out option for affected individuals. However, on March 11, 2026, Superhuman CEO Shishir Mehrotra announced via LinkedIn that the feature would be disabled while the company reassesses it.

Mehrotra explained, "The agent was designed to help users discover influential perspectives and scholarship relevant to their work, while also providing meaningful ways for experts to build deeper relationships with their fans."

The class action lawsuit, confirmed as pending, alleges unauthorized use of the experts' names in the AI tool. Superhuman has not provided further details on the reassessment process or timeline for potential relaunch.

Relaterede artikler

Realistic illustration of the 'Shy Girl' novel recalled by Hachette amid AI-generated content scandal, with glitchy pages and warning stamp.
Billede genereret af AI

Hachette pulls 'Shy Girl' from US and UK markets over AI content allegations

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

Hachette Book Group has canceled the planned US release and discontinued the UK edition of Mia Ballard's horror novel Shy Girl following a New York Times investigation alleging AI-generated text. The self-published title drew reader suspicions over repetitive prose and linguistic patterns. Author Ballard denies personal AI use, blaming an editor or acquaintance, and says the scandal has devastated her mental health.

Doctors, lawyers, and travel advisors are reportedly feeling slighted when clients use AI chatbots to verify their advice.

Rapporteret af AI

Anthropic has released a beta add-on bringing its Claude AI assistant to Microsoft Word, available now to customers on Team and Enterprise plans. The integration allows users to generate new content, edit documents, and handle comments within the app. It offers an alternative to Microsoft's Copilot.

Five major book publishers and author Scott Turow filed a class action lawsuit against Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in a US District Court in New York. They accuse the company of illegally using millions of copyrighted works to train its Llama AI models. Meta defends the practice as fair use.

Rapporteret af AI

Anthropic has restricted unlimited access to its Claude AI models through third-party agents like OpenClaw, requiring heavy users to pay extra via API keys or usage bundles starting April 4, 2026. The policy shift, announced over the weekend, addresses severe system strain from high-volume agent tools previously covered under $20 monthly subscriptions.

Anthropic has launched a legal plugin for its Claude Cowork tool, prompting concerns among dedicated legal AI providers. The plugin offers useful features for contract review and compliance but falls short of replacing specialized platforms. South African firms face additional hurdles due to data protection regulations.

Rapporteret af AI

Encyclopedia Britannica and its subsidiary Merriam-Webster have sued OpenAI, alleging copyright infringement for using their content to train AI models like ChatGPT without permission, as well as trademark infringement from the AI falsely attributing hallucinations to Britannica. The suit claims ChatGPT reproduces verbatim or near-verbatim portions, summaries, or abridgments of their works, cannibalizing traffic to their sites.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis