TRC inquiry to hear Zuma's arguments on Khampepe's recusal

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Cases Inquiry will hear oral arguments from former President Jacob Zuma's lawyers on Friday about why Chairperson Justice Sisi Khampepe should step down. Zuma filed for her recusal late last year, arguing her past roles make her unsuitable to lead the commission. His claims include potential conflicts with former colleagues and allegations of improper conduct.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Cases Inquiry is scheduled to convene on Friday to consider arguments from former President Jacob Zuma's legal team regarding the recusal of its Chairperson, Justice Sisi Khampepe. Zuma submitted his application for her removal late last year, asserting that her previous professional positions render her unfit to oversee the proceedings.

In his founding affidavit, Zuma highlighted that Khampepe could face challenges in impartially assessing testimony from witnesses, including her former colleagues and superiors from the TRC and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). He further accused her of misconduct, claiming she held secret discussions with the inquiry's Chief Evidence Leader, Advocate Ismael Semenya, to undermine a separate recusal bid against Zuma initiated by state institutions and victims' families. For these reasons, Zuma seeks to refer her to the Judicial Services Commission (JSC).

Zuma also alleged that Khampepe's personal animosity toward him, stemming from her time as a Constitutional Court Judge, contributed to what he describes as an unlawful ruling that resulted in his 15-month prison sentence for not appearing before the Zondo Commission.

This application has garnered support from other prominent figures, including former President Thabo Mbeki, former Justice Minister Brigitte Mabandla, former acting Justice Minister Thoko Didiza, and former Minister of Intelligence Ronnie Kasrils, who have filed similar requests.

The hearing comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the TRC's handling of historical cases, with Zuma's involvement drawing attention to lingering tensions from South Africa's post-apartheid reconciliation efforts.

Relaterede artikler

A dramatic courtroom scene from the Constitutional Court hearing on President Ramaphosa's impeachment over Phala Phala.
Billede genereret af AI

Constitutional court orders impeachment committee for Ramaphosa over Phala Phala

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

South Africa's Constitutional Court has ruled that Parliament acted unconstitutionally by blocking an impeachment inquiry into President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2022. The decision requires the National Assembly to establish an impeachment committee to examine the Phala Phala matter. Opposition parties immediately called for the president's resignation.

The National Prosecuting Authority has appeared to step back from its earlier admission of political interference in apartheid-era prosecutions. This shift emerged during cross-examination at the Khampepe inquiry on 25 May. Former president Thabo Mbeki is also challenging a summons to testify before the same panel.

Rapporteret af AI

A veteran advocate has told an inquiry that apartheid-era generals tried to halt investigations into past atrocities by threatening to expose senior ANC figures. The testimony came at the Khampepe Commission examining delays in Truth and Reconciliation Commission prosecutions.

President Cyril Ramaphosa has filed papers in the Western Cape High Court to review the Section 89 Independent Panel report on the Phala Phala matter. Several political parties say Parliament should continue preparing an impeachment committee. The filing occurred on 25 May 2026.

Rapporteret af AI

The United Africans Transformation party has raised concerns about the appointment of Makashule Gana as chairperson of the parliamentary impeachment committee investigating President Cyril Ramaphosa.

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis