TRC inquiry to hear Zuma's arguments on Khampepe's recusal

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Cases Inquiry will hear oral arguments from former President Jacob Zuma's lawyers on Friday about why Chairperson Justice Sisi Khampepe should step down. Zuma filed for her recusal late last year, arguing her past roles make her unsuitable to lead the commission. His claims include potential conflicts with former colleagues and allegations of improper conduct.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Cases Inquiry is scheduled to convene on Friday to consider arguments from former President Jacob Zuma's legal team regarding the recusal of its Chairperson, Justice Sisi Khampepe. Zuma submitted his application for her removal late last year, asserting that her previous professional positions render her unfit to oversee the proceedings.

In his founding affidavit, Zuma highlighted that Khampepe could face challenges in impartially assessing testimony from witnesses, including her former colleagues and superiors from the TRC and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). He further accused her of misconduct, claiming she held secret discussions with the inquiry's Chief Evidence Leader, Advocate Ismael Semenya, to undermine a separate recusal bid against Zuma initiated by state institutions and victims' families. For these reasons, Zuma seeks to refer her to the Judicial Services Commission (JSC).

Zuma also alleged that Khampepe's personal animosity toward him, stemming from her time as a Constitutional Court Judge, contributed to what he describes as an unlawful ruling that resulted in his 15-month prison sentence for not appearing before the Zondo Commission.

This application has garnered support from other prominent figures, including former President Thabo Mbeki, former Justice Minister Brigitte Mabandla, former acting Justice Minister Thoko Didiza, and former Minister of Intelligence Ronnie Kasrils, who have filed similar requests.

The hearing comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the TRC's handling of historical cases, with Zuma's involvement drawing attention to lingering tensions from South Africa's post-apartheid reconciliation efforts.

Labaran da ke da alaƙa

A dramatic courtroom scene from the Constitutional Court hearing on President Ramaphosa's impeachment over Phala Phala.
Hoton da AI ya samar

Constitutional court orders impeachment committee for Ramaphosa over Phala Phala

An Ruwaito ta hanyar AI Hoton da AI ya samar

South Africa's Constitutional Court has ruled that Parliament acted unconstitutionally by blocking an impeachment inquiry into President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2022. The decision requires the National Assembly to establish an impeachment committee to examine the Phala Phala matter. Opposition parties immediately called for the president's resignation.

The National Prosecuting Authority has appeared to step back from its earlier admission of political interference in apartheid-era prosecutions. This shift emerged during cross-examination at the Khampepe inquiry on 25 May. Former president Thabo Mbeki is also challenging a summons to testify before the same panel.

An Ruwaito ta hanyar AI

The Khampepe Commission of Inquiry into delays in Truth and Reconciliation Commission prosecutions has heard testimony on threats faced by investigators and progress made in handling cases. Advocate Shubnum Singh detailed active interference, including phone hacks and surveillance by persons of interest. Former NPA head Shamila Batohi outlined strategies to fast-track the cases.

South Africa's National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza has begun the process of forming a 31-member impeachment committee to examine allegations against President Cyril Ramaphosa over foreign currency found at his Phala Phala farm. The move follows a Constitutional Court ruling last Friday that declared a parliamentary rule unconstitutional and required the committee's establishment. Political parties must submit names for the committee by 22 May 2026.

An Ruwaito ta hanyar AI

The sub judice rule is unlikely to halt proceedings at the impeachment committee investigating President Cyril Ramaphosa over the Phala Phala matter. Ramaphosa's legal review of the Section 89 panel report is scheduled for early September at the Western Cape High Court. The committee is set to meet soon to decide its next steps.

A parliamentary ad hoc committee has concluded that witness testimony reveals a serious institutional crisis in South Africa’s law enforcement agencies. The findings follow months of hearings into allegations of drug cartel infiltration.

An Ruwaito ta hanyar AI

President Cyril Ramaphosa announced he will seek a court review of Parliament’s Section 89 report on the Phala Phala farm theft. He also stated he has no intention of resigning amid growing calls for his impeachment.

 

 

 

Wannan shafin yana amfani da cookies

Muna amfani da cookies don nazari don inganta shafin mu. Karanta manufar sirri mu don ƙarin bayani.
Ƙi