Senators Grassley and Durbin scrutinize crypto bill amid jurisdiction clash, with blockchain and law enforcement symbols.
Senators Grassley and Durbin scrutinize crypto bill amid jurisdiction clash, with blockchain and law enforcement symbols.
Bild generiert von KI

Senate judiciary leaders challenge crypto bill's jurisdiction

Bild generiert von KI

Senate Judiciary Committee leaders Chuck Grassley and Dick Durbin have raised concerns about a provision in a cryptocurrency market structure bill led by Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott, arguing it encroaches on their committee's jurisdiction. The dispute centers on exemptions for crypto software developers, which they say could hinder law enforcement efforts against money laundering. The bill's markup has been postponed amid this opposition and industry pushback.

Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott planned to hold a committee vote this week on sweeping cryptocurrency market structure legislation, but the markup was delayed due to jurisdictional objections and uncertainty over support. In a letter to Scott and ranking member Elizabeth Warren, Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and ranking member Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) objected to Section 604, which would exempt some crypto software developers from financial licensing requirements. They stated that the language "is precisely the type of legislative change that falls squarely within the Judiciary Committee’s jurisdiction," and noted their panel "was not consulted" beforehand.

The provision mirrors the bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, sponsored in the House by Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) and in the Senate by Sens. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). Grassley and Durbin warned it exempts "a dangerously broad category of actors from treatment under" current criminal law, potentially precluding charges against figures like the founder of Tornado Cash, a mixer platform used for laundering. They added that the bill "would also create a significant enforcement gap for decentralized digital asset platforms," risking attraction of illicit actors such as cartels.

A Scott spokesperson, Jeff Naft, responded that the parliamentarian ruled the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act falls within Banking's jurisdiction. "The Chairman remains committed to protecting software developers while ensuring that law enforcement has the necessary tools to prosecute actual illegal money transmission operations."

Grassley expressed appreciation for Scott's efforts in a statement: "We must protect our national and financial security, while ensuring crypto and other novel industries play by the same rules as everyone else." Sen. Lummis defended the exemptions, saying, "Blockchain developers who have simply written code and maintain open-source infrastructure have lived under threat of being classified as money transmitters for far too long... This designation makes no sense when they never touch, control, or have access to user funds, and unnecessarily limits innovation."

The National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys echoed concerns, stating the bill would "materially limit prosecutors’ ability to pursue financial crime cases." Meanwhile, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong criticized the draft for provisions banning stablecoin rewards and tokenized securities, calling it a "giveaway to the banks" undermining President Trump’s pro-crypto agenda. The delay has weakened crypto market sentiment, with overall capitalization dropping 1.23% to $3.23 trillion and Bitcoin falling 1.2% to $95,466.37.

Democratic senators negotiating the bill have pushed for changes to address DeFi risks for illicit finance. Senate Democrats have rejoined talks, signaling seriousness about rebooting the legislation while keeping details private.

Was die Leute sagen

X discussions highlight Senate Judiciary leaders Grassley and Durbin's jurisdictional objections to Tim Scott's crypto market structure bill, focusing on developer exemptions potentially undermining anti-money laundering enforcement. Reporters detail the committee turf battle and markup delay. Crypto advocates criticize the opposition for risking stricter regulations on innovation, while some dismiss it as bureaucratic resistance to pro-crypto reforms.

Verwandte Artikel

Senate banking committee members in a formal hearing room debating cryptocurrency legislation.
Bild generiert von KI

Senate banking committee to mark up clarity act next week

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

Lawmakers are accelerating efforts to advance the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act through the Senate, with a key committee markup scheduled for the week of May 11. White House and congressional officials are pushing for passage by July 4 amid ongoing negotiations over stablecoin rules and ethics provisions.

The Senate Banking Committee voted 15-9 to advance the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on May 17. The move signals progress toward a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in the United States, though the bill still requires a full Senate vote.

Von KI berichtet

Administration officials hosted law enforcement representatives at the White House on June 10 to address concerns about Section 604 of the CLARITY Act. The provision would shield many software developers from money-transmitter rules while keeping exchanges and hosted wallets under compliance requirements. Discussions centered on whether broad protections could hinder prosecutions of crypto-related crimes.

Dienstag, 09. Juni 2026, 23:17 Uhr

Crypto groups urge Senate floor vote on CLARITY Act

Donnerstag, 14. Mai 2026, 07:52 Uhr

Senate banking committee advances crypto clarity act

Freitag, 08. Mai 2026, 03:23 Uhr

Clarity act markup faces ethics and stablecoin hurdles

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen