Senators demand probe into DOJ official's crypto conflict

A group of U.S. senators has called for an explanation from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche regarding his decision to disband a cryptocurrency enforcement team while holding significant digital assets. The move, detailed in a memo last April, has raised concerns about potential violations of federal conflict-of-interest laws. The Campaign Legal Center has also filed a complaint urging an internal DOJ investigation.

In a letter dated January 28, six Democratic senators, including Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, demanded answers from Todd Blanche, the U.S. Deputy Attorney General and a former criminal attorney for President Trump. The senators questioned Blanche's motivations for issuing a memo in April that disbanded the four-year-old National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team, which had led investigations into crypto-enabled crimes and coordinated prosecutions.

The memo directed prosecutors not to pursue crypto exchanges, mixers, and offline wallets for the acts of their end users or unwitting regulatory violations. At the time, this was seen by some as an effort to influence New York prosecutors who had charged Roman Storm, the developer of a crypto mixer, a case that irked allies of Trump in the cryptocurrency industry. The senators suggested the decision might have benefited Trump's crypto ventures, but recent reporting has shifted scrutiny to Blanche's personal holdings.

According to ProPublica, Blanche held up to $480,000 in cryptocurrency when he issued the memo. Despite pledging to divest his holdings 'as soon as practicable,' he did not begin selling until late May. 'The fact that you held substantial amounts of cryptocurrency at the time you made this decision calls into question your own motivations,' the senators wrote in their letter.

Last week, the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the DOJ's Office of the Inspector General, asking it to investigate whether the memo 'benefitted the digital asset industry' and, by extension, Blanche's investments. Such a conflict could violate federal laws, punishable by up to five years in prison.

A spokesperson for Blanche responded to ProPublica, stating he 'upholds the highest levels of transparency and ethical standards. As such, this was appropriately flagged, addressed, and cleared in advance.' The senators have now requested details on this statement, the conflict-of-interest procedures followed, and the delay in divesting his crypto assets.

This episode highlights ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and cryptocurrency regulation, amid broader concerns about conflicts of interest in federal enforcement.

Verwandte Artikel

Illustration of Colin McDonald facing Senate scrutiny during confirmation hearing for DOJ fraud unit amid White House 'war on fraud' initiative.
Bild generiert von KI

Trump nominee Colin McDonald faces scrutiny over proposed DOJ fraud division amid White House ‘war on fraud’ push

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI Fakten geprüft

Colin McDonald, President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead a newly proposed Justice Department unit focused on fraud in federally funded programs, told senators he would pursue cases “without fear or favor” as Democrats questioned whether the initiative could blur lines between the White House and prosecutorial decision-making.

Democrats are escalating their criticism of President Donald Trump's family-linked cryptocurrency ventures as midterm elections approach in November. Leading figures like Senator Elizabeth Warren have called for investigations into projects such as World Liberty Financial. The strategy aims to highlight potential conflicts of interest amid Trump's pro-crypto policies.

Von KI berichtet

Almost two months after unveiling a proposed rule on March 5 to let the attorney general review ethics complaints against DOJ attorneys before state bar action, the Justice Department faces intensifying debate. With Pam Bondi out as attorney general and Todd Blanche acting in the role, officials cite rising politically motivated filings—citing cases involving Bondi, Ed Martin and Drew Ensign—while critics decry it as undermining state oversight and the McDade-Murtha Amendment.

Ed Martin, serving as U.S. pardon attorney in the Trump administration, has been accused of ethical violations for threatening sanctions against Georgetown University Law Center over its diversity programs. The D.C. Bar's disciplinary counsel also alleges he improperly pressured judges to interfere with an investigation into his conduct. These claims stem from a complaint by a retired California judge.

Von KI berichtet

Former FBI Director James Comey has told a federal appeals court that the Department of Justice cannot salvage its case against him due to an unlawful appointment of a prosecutor. Comey accuses the DOJ of hypocrisy, contrasting its stance here with its position in a prior Trump case. The dispute centers on Attorney General Pam Bondi's appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. attorney.

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen