Dramatic illustration of US Supreme Court invalidating Trump's emergency tariffs, as he announces a new global 10% tariff.
Dramatic illustration of US Supreme Court invalidating Trump's emergency tariffs, as he announces a new global 10% tariff.
Bild generiert von KI

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's emergency tariffs

Bild generiert von KI

The US Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The decision delivers a major setback to his trade policy and raises questions over deals with South Korea and others. Trump responded by ordering a new 10 percent global tariff.

The US Supreme Court ruled on February 20, 2026 (US time) in a 6-3 decision that President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs was unlawful. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the opinion, "We hold that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs." The law allows regulation of commerce during national emergencies but lacks explicit reference to tariffs or duties.

Trump announced the reciprocal tariffs on April 2, 2025, dubbing it "Liberation Day," citing trade deficits as a national security threat. Tariffs on South Korean products were reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent under a bilateral deal where Seoul pledged $350 billion in US investments, among other commitments.

The ruling spares other measures like Section 232 tariffs but opens the door to refunds exceeding $175 billion. Penn Wharton Budget Model economists estimated potential refunds at over $175 billion. Businesses have filed more than 1,800 lawsuits, and the process is expected to be lengthy.

South Korea's presidential office, Cheong Wa Dae, stated it will review the decision and US position to respond in the national interest. Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said, "The overall export conditions secured through the Korea-US tariff agreement will largely remain intact." Trump immediately invoked Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to impose a 10 percent global tariff for 150 days, on top of existing duties, with exemptions for certain goods.

The decision adds uncertainty to Trump's trade agenda amid midterm elections and affordability concerns. South Korean firms are unlikely to alter US investment plans but are preparing for further measures.

Was die Leute sagen

Discussions on X reveal polarized sentiments following the US Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling against Trump's use of IEEPA for emergency tariffs. Critics celebrate it as a check on executive power and express outrage over Trump's new 10% global tariff response. Supporters view the decision as procedural, affirming other tariff authorities and praising Trump's pivot as strategic America First policy.

Verwandte Artikel

Illustration depicting Supreme Court striking down Trump's broad tariffs as he signs a new 15% global tariff order amid political drama.
Bild generiert von KI

Supreme Court rules against Trump's broad tariffs

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that President Trump cannot use the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose broad-scale tariffs, prompting immediate responses from the administration and political figures. Trump signed a 15% global tariff under a different law the next day and criticized the court on Monday. The decision has sparked debates over its political implications ahead of the midterms and the State of the Union address.

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision on Friday ruling that President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were unconstitutional. Trump responded by announcing new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, later raising them to 15 percent. The European Union has paused a recent trade deal with the US amid the resulting uncertainty.

Von KI berichtet

In a 6-3 decision, the US Supreme Court has struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, citing lack of congressional authorization. The ruling triggered a relief rally in financial markets, including a brief spike in Bitcoin to $68,000, though gains faded amid ongoing uncertainties. President Trump responded by announcing a new 10% global tariff under Section 122.

US-Präsident Donald Trump unterzeichnete am Freitag (20) eine Verordnung, die einen 10%igen Zoll auf Importe aus allen Ländern verhängt, als Reaktion auf das Urteil des Obersten Gerichts, dass vorherige Zölle unter dem IEEPA-Gesetz illegal waren. Die neue Maßnahme tritt am 24. Februar in Kraft und dauert 150 Tage, wobei Artikel wie Rindfleisch, Orangen und kritische Mineralien ausgenommen sind. Für Brasilien verbessert der globale Satz die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit im Vergleich zu früheren reziproken Zöllen von bis zu 50%.

Von KI berichtet

Following the US Supreme Court's ruling invalidating President Trump's reciprocal tariffs, South Korea's government stated it will continue 'amicable' consultations with the United States to protect favorable export conditions secured under their bilateral trade deal. Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan pledged ongoing support for local businesses to enhance global competitiveness. Trump announced a new 15 percent global tariff in response.

Der indonesische Präsident Prabowo Subianto äußerte Bereitschaft, Risiken durch die Erhöhung der globalen Importzölle durch US-Präsident Donald Trump auf 15 % abzumildern, die am 21. Februar 2026 angekündigt wurde, einen Tag nach einem Urteil des Obersten Gerichts, das frühere Zölle für ungültig erklärte. Beamte bestätigten, dass bilaterale Handelsverhandlungen fortgesetzt werden, und hoben zollfreie Abkommen für wichtige indonesische Exporte hervor.

Von KI berichtet

The US Supreme Court has declared tariffs imposed on coffee imports by the Trump administration unconstitutional, potentially paving the way for refunds to affected roasters and importers. While the industry welcomes the decision for offering cost relief, questions remain over the process and timeline for reimbursements. The ruling highlights ongoing trade tensions that reshaped global coffee dynamics last year.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen