Federal court declares incompetence in Alonso Ancira's lawsuit against AHMSA

The Ninth Federal Labor Court in Mexico City declared itself incompetent to resolve Alonso Ancira Elizondo's labor lawsuit against Altos Hornos de México (AHMSA), ordering the case to be sent to Saltillo, Coahuila. Ancira demands payment of outstanding benefits after leaving the steel company, including indemnities and seniority recognition. This ruling halts his strategy to litigate in the capital.

The Ninth Federal Labor Court in Mexico City determined its incompetence to hear the labor lawsuit filed by Alonso Ancira Elizondo against Altos Hornos de México (AHMSA). Case file 77/2024 involves claims for unpaid benefits following Ancira's departure from the steel company. The court reviewed the evidence and ordered the case to be transferred to a jurisdictional body in Saltillo, Coahuila, where the process will continue.

In October 2025, Ancira notified his withdrawal from a labor liquidation exceeding 300 million pesos in the mercantile contest process, overseen by Judge Ruth Haggi Huerta García. However, he had already filed a separate lawsuit against AHMSA for breach of contractual conditions, claiming debts arising from his employment relationship.

Ancira's demands include an indemnity equivalent to five months' salary for each year worked, based on a 2021 contract. He also seeks recognition of his seniority from March 1990, as well as payment of labor liabilities acknowledged in AHMSA's 2022 financial statements. Additionally, he claims proportional payments for year-end bonus, vacations, and legal premiums.

The Fourth Federal Labor Court in Coahuila had expressed reservations about taking the case, noting that the law allows the worker to choose the contract's domicile or the defendant's. The determination of the competent instance must be resolved before February 27, the scheduled date for the auction of assets from AHMSA and Minera del Norte (MINOSA). With this ruling, Ancira's case remains in limbo pending final assignment.

Related Articles

Supreme Court judges in robes rejecting appeal from a distressed young student in a homicide case at a Calama high school
Image generated by AI

Supreme Court rejects appeal from student charged with Calama homicide

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The Supreme Court's Second Chamber rejected in a divided ruling an amparo appeal filed by the defense of Hernán Meneses, the 18-year-old student charged with the homicide of inspector María Victoria Reyes at a Calama high school on March 27.

The IV Chamber of the National Appeals Court in Federal Contencioso Administrativo ordered labor judge Alejandro Ojeda to transfer the labor reform case within 24 hours. The order aims to resolve the jurisdiction dispute and speed up the government's challenge to the CGT's injunction. It marks another setback for the labor union confederation.

Reported by AI

The Seventh Guarantee Court of Santiago declared admissible the criminal complaint filed by former mayor Irací Hassler against Mayor Mario Desbordes. The complaint accuses the mayor of false accusation in the Sierra Bella case.

The Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca has backed the Consejo de Estado ruling that suspends transfers of funds from AFP private pension administrators to Colpensiones. The decision drew criticism from President Gustavo Petro and Labor Minister Antonio Sanguino. Colpensiones stated that resources belonging to 129,000 people who switched regimes must be moved to cover pension payments.

Reported by AI

A Tunja judge ordered the reinstatement of John Jairo Martínez Álvarez as executive president of the Tunja Chamber of Commerce following a tutela action. The ruling creates the possibility of two presidents at the entity, which covers 71 municipalities and manages a budget over $15 billion pesos.

Spain's Supreme Court has begun the trial of former minister José Luis Ábalos and his ex-advisor Koldo García over alleged corruption in mask contracts during the pandemic. Key witnesses, including Ábalos's son, García's brother, and Ábalos's ex-partner, testified denying involvement in money handling or irregular appointments. Defenses pointed to businessman Víctor de Aldama as the main culprit.

Reported by AI

For the second time, actress Elisa Mouliaá skipped a court appearance on Friday in Madrid over Íñigo Errejón's calumny complaint against her. Citing anxiety-related sick leave, she prompted Judge Arturo Zamarriego to dispatch a forensic doctor to verify her condition. Errejón and a key witness testified, upholding the allegations.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline