Constitutional Court maintains suspension of Murcian law on union subsidies

Spain's Constitutional Court plenary has decided to maintain the suspension of a law modifying the institutional participation of unions and employer groups in the Murcia Region. The Government appealed it in October 2025 for invading state competencies and removing the parity principle in subsidies. The suspension will last until a final ruling.

Spain's Constitutional Court has ruled to keep inoperative a law passed in July 2025 by PP and Vox in the Murcia Region, which changes rules on institutional participation by representative unions and employer organizations. The initial suspension was ordered on October 29, 2025, when President Pedro Sánchez, at the urging of the Labor Ministry and through the State Attorney, filed an appeal against it. The Government claims the changes invade exclusive state powers on freedom of association (Constitution articles 28.1 and 81) and labor legislation (149.1.7). Specifically, it removes the requirement to fund these groups via nominative subsidies to cover participation costs, scrapping the parity principle that treats unions and employers equally. This could allow subsidies only for businesses, per the appeal. Second Deputy Prime Minister and Labor Minister Yolanda Díaz announced plans to challenge the law on October 22, 2025, at a UGT event on union freedom, criticizing a far-right push to dismantle social dialogue. A week later, the Council of Ministers approved the appeal. The Court's order, accessed by EL PAÍS, supports extending the suspension as its enforcement would cause 'grave harm to the general interest', damaging unions' and employers' roles in representing social and economic interests.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Argentine deputies from La Libertad Avanza approve labor reform with 44 signatures after concessions, as opposition presents counter-proposal and CGT strike looms.
AI:n luoma kuva

Deputies approve labor reform opinion after officialism's concessions

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

In a joint committee plenary, La Libertad Avanza's officialism secured the majority opinion for the labor reform with 44 signatures, after removing the controversial Article 44 on sick leave. The opposition, led by Unión por la Patria, presented a counter-reform proposing shorter workdays and expanded worker rights. Meanwhile, the CGT called a national strike for February 19 in opposition to the bill.

Argentina's Sala IV of the Contencioso Administrativo Federal Appeals Chamber ruled that the General Confederation of Labor (CGT)'s ongoing constitutional challenge to labor reform law 27.802 belongs in administrative jurisdiction, not labor courts. Judges Rogelio Vicenti and Marcelo Duffy sided with the national government in a win against the union confederation's efforts to block the reform, first challenged judicially in March.

Raportoinut AI

The government began on Friday the process for two judges nearing 75 to remain in office, including Víctor Arturo Pesino, who upheld the labor reform. Pesino signed with María Dora González the ruling suspending a precautionary measure against the law. The CGT criticized the decision and plans to appeal.

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation decided to intervene in the case filed by La Pampa against the National State over the distribution of National Treasury Contributions. The highest court gave the government 60 days to respond.

Raportoinut AI

Workers from the National Justice system occupied the Labor Justice headquarters in Buenos Aires on Tuesday to protest against the labor reform. The Union of Employees of the Nation's Justice (UEJN) announced a strike in rejection of the transfer of the labor jurisdiction to the Capital Federal's orbit. The event included participation from the CGT and opposition political figures.

In the 'QR!' program on Canal E, experts analyzed the government's university funding project and compared it to the current law. Germán Pinazo, vice-rector of the Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, stated that the executive is breaching an existing regulation backed by the judiciary. The discussion highlighted budgetary obligations and effects on salaries and scholarships.

Raportoinut AI

Argentina's Senate held a public hearing for judge Carlos Mahiques' five-year term extension in the Federal Cassation Court, marked by clashes between ruling bloc and opposition. Kirchnerist senators questioned the process's legality and commission makeup, while Mahiques defended his record and rejected accusations over the Lago Escondido trip. Officialism and allies gathered signatures for a favorable report.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää