Constitutional Court

Seuraa
Illustration of Constitutional Court Magistrate Carlos Camargo proposing to suspend the economic emergency decree, with business support and presidential concern.
AI:n luoma kuva

Magistrate Camargo proposes suspending economic emergency

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

Constitutional Court Magistrate Carlos Camargo filed a ponencia to provisionally strike down the economic emergency decree issued by the Government on December 22, 2025. He argues that it fails to meet constitutional requirements for a sudden and unforeseeable crisis, aiming to prevent irreversible effects while the case is decided on merits. Business groups like Fenalco and the National Business Council back this view, while President Gustavo Petro warns of a fiscal crisis if suspended.

Spain's Constitutional Court plenary has decided to maintain the suspension of a law modifying the institutional participation of unions and employer groups in the Murcia Region. The Government appealed it in October 2025 for invading state competencies and removing the parity principle in subsidies. The suspension will last until a final ruling.

Raportoinut AI

Indonesia's DPR plenary session has approved that the Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MKMK) lacks authority to process reports on Adies Kadir's candidacy as a Constitutional Court judge. The decision stems from Komisi III's conclusions, while the MKMK chair refused to disclose the report's contents to preserve independence. The report was filed by 21 academics and legal practitioners alleging ethics violations.

Indonesia's Constitutional Court has ruled that active Polri members must resign or retire to hold civil positions. The decision, Number 114/PUU-XXIII/2025, was pronounced on November 13, 2025, drawing responses from experts, DPR, and Polri. It eliminates a legal loophole in the 2002 Polri Law.

Raportoinut AI

Two Constitutional Court magistrates have dissented from the acquittal of Miguel López for the 2016 murder of his mother-in-law. In particular votes, they argue the decision sends a 'perturbing message' and deprives prosecutors of a fair trial. The case has gone through multiple judicial levels after an initial verdict was destroyed.

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää