CBS analyst predicts Trump Supreme Court losses in 2026

CBS News legal analyst Jan Crawford forecasted significant defeats for President Donald Trump at the Supreme Court in 2026, despite the administration's recent successes. Speaking on 'Face the Nation,' she highlighted upcoming challenges on issues like birthright citizenship and tariffs. Crawford emphasized that temporary emergency rulings do not guarantee victories on the merits.

On the December 28, 2025, broadcast of CBS's 'Face the Nation,' legal analyst Jan Crawford discussed the Trump administration's judicial track record. She acknowledged the "tremendous success" the administration has enjoyed with the Supreme Court through emergency rulings, which temporarily halt lower court decisions and enable policies to proceed during litigation.

However, Crawford predicted a shift in 2026, describing the Court's next term as "highly consequential." She specifically dismissed the chances of success in the case challenging Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. "The Trump administration will 'absolutely not' win its case before the Supreme Court on the legality of President Trump’s executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship," she stated, as shared in a post by the show's Twitter account.

Host Margaret Brennan questioned her certainty, to which Crawford replied, "No, absolutely not." She explained that the administration has been strategic in selecting appeals it believes it can win, but these are merely "temporary, interim orders." Once cases reach the merits, outcomes could differ markedly. Crawford added that Trump "may not win the tariffs case," noting that while the current outlook favors the president, it could change by June after landmark rulings.

The discussion also touched on other pressing matters before the Court, including gun rights and the participation of transgender women in women's sports. Crawford's analysis underscores the potential volatility in the Supreme Court's docket, even for an administration that has shaped its composition.

Articoli correlati

Illustration depicting the U.S. Supreme Court reviewing a challenge to President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, with three infants and their noncitizen parents in the foreground.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Trump Birthright Citizenship Order

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA Verificato

Three infants born to noncitizen parents are at the center of Barbara v. Trump, a class‑action lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship for some children born in the United States. The Supreme Court has agreed to review the dispute over the order, which targets babies whose mothers lack legal status or are in the country on temporary visas and whose fathers are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents.

In 2025, the US Supreme Court's conservative supermajority repeatedly supported President Donald Trump's expansive agenda, clearing paths for executive actions on immigration, the economy, and electoral power. This alignment, often without explanation via the shadow docket, raised questions about the court's role in democracy. Legal analysts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the implications in a year-end podcast, highlighting the focus on voting rights cases.

Riportato dall'IA

In 2025, widespread opposition challenged President Trump's policies through street protests, electoral victories, and court rulings. Approval ratings for Trump dropped sharply amid economic struggles and controversial deportations. Legal experts highlight over 150 federal court blocks on his executive actions, though the Supreme Court offered mixed support.

The Trump administration has dismissed nearly 100 immigration judges over the past year, according to an NPR tally. This includes significant changes at the San Francisco Immigration Court, which is set to close by January 2027 due to a non-renewed lease. Cases from the court will transfer to a nearby facility in Concord.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

In an unsigned emergency order on Nov. 6, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to enforce a rule requiring U.S. passports to list sex as assigned at birth, pausing a lower-court injunction. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.

Congress began 2025 with bold plans to bolster the economy, secure the border, and enhance military strength, but ended the year having passed a record-low number of bills and surrendered significant authority to President Trump. Internal divisions hampered Republican leaders in both chambers amid narrow majorities. Looking ahead, midterm elections and pressing issues like affordability loom large.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed confidence that the United States can avoid a broad recession even as some parts of the economy have slipped into contraction, saying in a televised interview that he is “very, very optimistic” about 2026.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta