Trial over Guillermo Plazas Alcid stadium collapse faces prescriptions

The criminal trial for irregularities in the remodeling of Neiva's Guillermo Plazas Alcid Stadium is on the brink of collapse due to judicial delays causing the prescription of several crimes. Accused interventors and contractors could be exonerated from lesser charges, leaving only embezzlement by appropriation intact. The 2016 tragedy, which killed four and injured ten, might end without convictions due to the passage of time.

The partial collapse of the western stand at Neiva's Guillermo Plazas Alcid Stadium happened on August 19, 2016, resulting in four deaths, ten injuries, and the loss of a 24 billion peso investment. The criminal process, started over anomalies in contract No. 921 of 2012 for studies and designs, now faces a 'legal collapse' due to delays in the preparatory hearing.

Prosecutors charge private individuals like Erika Johanna Fernández Figueroa, representative of Consorcio Diseños Estadio, as co-author in crimes such as ideological falsehood in public documents and contracts without legal requirements. Her lawyer, Mauricio Toro Chávarro, states these charges have prescribed: ideological falsehood in February 2022, and contracts without requirements in May 2024, after over eight years from the 2017 imputation. Similarly, Gustavo Adolfo Arboleda Álvarez and Miguel Alejandro Lozano Castañeda, classified as interveners, benefit from these timelines.

Judge Freddy Peña Ávila of Neiva's Fourth Circuit Criminal Court will only rule at the end of the extended hearing. For action by prevarication, urban curator Mauricio Vargas Cuéllar would also see his charge prescribe in August 2025. The only surviving crime is embezzlement by appropriation of high amount, with a prescription term until 2032, depending on penalty qualification.

This scenario, worsened by judge and prosecutor changes and dilatory tactics, undermines the prosecution by eliminating evidence of irregularities like false compliance certifications for incomplete designs and financial omissions. Victims and public interest face risks of partial or total impunity if delays persist.

관련 기사

Illustration of Spain's Supreme Court trial for Koldo case: defendants Ábalos and García, witness testifying amid corruption allegations over pandemic mask contracts.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

First day of Koldo case trial in Supreme Court

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Spain's Supreme Court has begun the trial of former minister José Luis Ábalos and his ex-advisor Koldo García over alleged corruption in mask contracts during the pandemic. Key witnesses, including Ábalos's son, García's brother, and Ábalos's ex-partner, testified denying involvement in money handling or irregular appointments. Defenses pointed to businessman Víctor de Aldama as the main culprit.

The trial over alleged corruption in Neiva's 2020 School Feeding Program (PAE) contracting moves forward with a new judicial timeline, led by Judge Olga María Erazo. Former mayor Gorky Muñoz Calderón, now a Senate candidate, faces charges alongside ex-officials and contractors. The preparatory hearing aims to wrap up evidence discovery to start the oral trial in March.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Prosecutors will charge Neiva's ex-mayor Gorky Muñoz Calderón and two former officials with prevarication for illegally expanding the urban perimeter via Decree 1066 of 2023. Issued weeks before his term ended, it was revoked by the current administration. The hearing was suspended and will resume after Easter week.

A judge from the Second Administrative Court of Neiva ordered the city hall to pay $1,507,618,324 plus moratorium interest to Consorcio Atenas 121 for settling the construction contract of the Minor Volleyball Coliseum. The ruling settles a lawsuit after failed conciliation attempts and payment delays since the project handover in 2023. The consortium claims a lack of municipal willingness to settle the debt.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Judge Santiago Pedraz of Spain's National Court has dismissed the ambulances case, a spin-off from the 3% case on irregular financing of Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya (CDC). The ruling comes after three years of investigation failing to prove criminal irregularities in a 2014 tender. Anticorruption Prosecutors support the dismissal.

Argentina's Federal Chamber of Casación Penal has set a March 30 hearing to settle a jurisdiction dispute over the probe into AFA's purchase of a luxury mansion in Pilar, amid money laundering allegations tied to football officials including treasurer Pablo Toviggino. This follows AFA's recent address change to Pilar and prior revelations of suspicious payments linked to the property.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부