EU Commission building with X logo fined €120M for transparency violations under DSA, showing blue checkmarks, ads, data locks, Elon Musk silhouette, and Europe download surge.
Imagem gerada por IA

European Union fines X about $140 million over transparency violations

Imagem gerada por IA
Verificado

The European Commission has imposed a fine of €120 million (about $140 million) on X for breaching transparency rules under the Digital Services Act, citing deceptive use of blue checkmarks, ad transparency failures and limits on researcher access to data. Elon Musk, who bought the platform in 2022, has framed the move as an attack on free speech while pointing to a surge in downloads across Europe.

The European Commission announced on Friday that it fined X €120 million — roughly $140 million — for non‑compliance with transparency obligations under the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA).

According to the Commission’s decision and accompanying press materials, the penalty is the first non‑compliance fine issued under the DSA and targets three main areas: the deceptive design of X’s blue checkmark system, a lack of transparency in the platform’s advertising repository, and X’s failure to provide required access to public data for researchers. The Commission said that allowing users to pay for a “verified” blue checkmark without meaningful identity checks misleads the public about account authenticity and exposes users to scams and impersonation, and that X’s ad repository lacks key information and erects barriers that prevent effective scrutiny by researchers and civil society.

Elon Musk, who purchased what was then Twitter in 2022 and later rebranded it as X, has used the platform to attack the ruling and argue that Brussels is targeting a platform he presents as committed to free speech. As highlighted by the Daily Wire, Musk promoted third‑party rankings showing X had become the most downloaded app across Europe after the EU announced its action. On Sunday he posted that “X is seeing record‑breaking downloads in many countries in Europe” and added, “Now number 1 in every EU country!” He also wrote, “The European Union is not DEMOcracy–rule of the people–but rather BUREAUcracy–rule of the unelected bureaucrat!”

X executives have also criticized how the European Commission publicized its decision. In a response reported by the Daily Wire and echoed in technology outlets, X’s head of product, Nikita Bier, accused the Commission of exploiting a quirk in the platform’s advertising tools to boost the reach of its announcement. “The irony of your announcement: You logged into your dormant ad account to take advantage of an exploit in our Ad Composer — to post a link that deceives users into thinking it’s a video and to artificially increase its reach,” Bier wrote in a post on X. He added that X believes “everyone should have an equal voice” on the platform and said the Commission’s ad account had been terminated. Musk later reposted Bier’s statement. X has since cut off the Commission’s access to its ad account, a move described as largely symbolic by some analysts because the account had reportedly seen little use in recent years.

The EU’s action has prompted a sharp response from senior figures in the Trump administration in Washington, underscoring broader transatlantic tensions over regulation of U.S. technology firms. As reported by the Daily Wire and other outlets, Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the Commission’s decision “an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments,” adding that “the days of censoring Americans online are over.” Vice President JD Vance, speaking shortly before the fine was publicly announced, argued that the EU should “support free speech not attack American companies over garbage.”

European officials, for their part, insist the case is about enforcing EU law rather than policing political speech. In its press release, the Commission said the DSA is intended to protect users’ rights and ensure transparency around how major platforms operate, including how accounts are presented as verified, how ads are labeled and archived, and how researchers can study systemic online risks.

The dispute over X highlights a growing clash between U.S. political leaders skeptical of European regulation and EU policymakers determined to assert their authority over large digital platforms that operate across the bloc. X has 60 to 90 days, depending on the specific obligations, to detail how it will address the violations or face the possibility of additional penalties under the DSA.

O que as pessoas estão dizendo

Discussions on X portray the EU's €120 million fine on X under the DSA primarily as bureaucratic overreach and an assault on free speech, with Elon Musk demanding the EU's abolition and supporters celebrating X's surge to the top news app in every EU country. Critics defend the penalty as justified enforcement for deceptive blue checkmarks, ad opacity, and researcher data blocks, without curbing content. Skeptics highlight hypocrisy and censorship-by-proxy risks.

Artigos relacionados

Illustration depicting EU officials presenting the Digital Services Act report in a conference room, contrasted with worried U.S. officials and free-speech advocates protesting in the background.
Imagem gerada por IA

UE defende Lei de Serviços Digitais na primeira revisão enquanto críticos da liberdade de expressão e autoridades dos EUA soam alarmes

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA Verificado

O primeiro relatório da Comissão Europeia sobre a Lei de Serviços Digitais, publicado na segunda-feira, descreve a lei como 'agnóstica em relação ao conteúdo' e alinhada com direitos fundamentais, enquanto grupos da sociedade civil e autoridades dos EUA alertam que ela pode inibir a expressão e sobrecarregar empresas de tecnologia americanas.

Os Estados Unidos alertaram para restrições a grandes fornecedores de serviços da União Europeia em retaliação às regulações tecnológicas da UE que visam empresas americanas. Essa escalada segue uma multa de 140 milhões de dólares imposta ao X de Elon Musk sob a Lei de Serviços Digitais da UE, atraindo críticas acentuadas da administração Trump. Autoridades europeias afirmam que suas regras garantem um campo de jogo justo para todos os negócios.

Reportado por IA

A União Europeia lançou uma investigação formal à xAI de Elon Musk após preocupações de que o seu chatbot Grok gerou imagens sexualizadas sem consentimento, incluindo material potencial de abuso sexual infantil. Os reguladores estão a examinar se a empresa cumpriu a Lei dos Serviços Digitais na mitigação de riscos na plataforma X. As multas podem atingir 6 por cento do volume de negócios anual global da xAI se forem encontradas violações.

As autoridades francesas invadiram os escritórios da X de Elon Musk em Paris em 3 de fevereiro de 2026, como parte de uma investigação de um ano sobre conteúdo ilegal gerado pelo chatbot Grok. Promotores convocaram Musk e a ex-CEO Linda Yaccarino para interrogatório em abril. Separadamente, reguladores do Reino Unido lançaram uma investigação sobre a criação pelo Grok de imagens sexuais sem consentimento.

Reportado por IA

British Imran Ahmed, head of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over sanctions threatening his expulsion from the United States. These measures target five Europeans accused of censorship harming US interests in tech regulation. The European Union condemns the sanctions as unjustified and is considering retaliation.

X atualizou os seus termos de serviço e apresentou uma contrapropositura para defender a propriedade das marcas do Twitter contra o desafio de uma startup. O movimento surge após a Operation Bluebird, fundada por um ex-executivo do Twitter, ter tentado cancelar as marcas da X para lançar uma nova plataforma social. Esta disputa destaca as tensões contínuas sobre o legado do serviço de redes sociais rebatizado.

Reportado por IA

O primeiro-ministro espanhol Pedro Sánchez anunciou planos para proibir crianças menores de 16 anos de usarem redes sociais, seguindo o exemplo da Austrália. A legislação, parte de regulações mais amplas, pode entrar em vigor na próxima semana com requisitos rigorosos de verificação de idade. Sánchez criticou as plataformas por expor crianças a danos e pediu responsabilização dos executivos de tecnologia.

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar