EU Commission building with X logo fined €120M for transparency violations under DSA, showing blue checkmarks, ads, data locks, Elon Musk silhouette, and Europe download surge.
EU Commission building with X logo fined €120M for transparency violations under DSA, showing blue checkmarks, ads, data locks, Elon Musk silhouette, and Europe download surge.
Image générée par IA

European Union fines X about $140 million over transparency violations

Image générée par IA
Vérifié par des faits

The European Commission has imposed a fine of €120 million (about $140 million) on X for breaching transparency rules under the Digital Services Act, citing deceptive use of blue checkmarks, ad transparency failures and limits on researcher access to data. Elon Musk, who bought the platform in 2022, has framed the move as an attack on free speech while pointing to a surge in downloads across Europe.

The European Commission announced on Friday that it fined X €120 million — roughly $140 million — for non‑compliance with transparency obligations under the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA).

According to the Commission’s decision and accompanying press materials, the penalty is the first non‑compliance fine issued under the DSA and targets three main areas: the deceptive design of X’s blue checkmark system, a lack of transparency in the platform’s advertising repository, and X’s failure to provide required access to public data for researchers. The Commission said that allowing users to pay for a “verified” blue checkmark without meaningful identity checks misleads the public about account authenticity and exposes users to scams and impersonation, and that X’s ad repository lacks key information and erects barriers that prevent effective scrutiny by researchers and civil society.

Elon Musk, who purchased what was then Twitter in 2022 and later rebranded it as X, has used the platform to attack the ruling and argue that Brussels is targeting a platform he presents as committed to free speech. As highlighted by the Daily Wire, Musk promoted third‑party rankings showing X had become the most downloaded app across Europe after the EU announced its action. On Sunday he posted that “X is seeing record‑breaking downloads in many countries in Europe” and added, “Now number 1 in every EU country!” He also wrote, “The European Union is not DEMOcracy–rule of the people–but rather BUREAUcracy–rule of the unelected bureaucrat!”

X executives have also criticized how the European Commission publicized its decision. In a response reported by the Daily Wire and echoed in technology outlets, X’s head of product, Nikita Bier, accused the Commission of exploiting a quirk in the platform’s advertising tools to boost the reach of its announcement. “The irony of your announcement: You logged into your dormant ad account to take advantage of an exploit in our Ad Composer — to post a link that deceives users into thinking it’s a video and to artificially increase its reach,” Bier wrote in a post on X. He added that X believes “everyone should have an equal voice” on the platform and said the Commission’s ad account had been terminated. Musk later reposted Bier’s statement. X has since cut off the Commission’s access to its ad account, a move described as largely symbolic by some analysts because the account had reportedly seen little use in recent years.

The EU’s action has prompted a sharp response from senior figures in the Trump administration in Washington, underscoring broader transatlantic tensions over regulation of U.S. technology firms. As reported by the Daily Wire and other outlets, Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the Commission’s decision “an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments,” adding that “the days of censoring Americans online are over.” Vice President JD Vance, speaking shortly before the fine was publicly announced, argued that the EU should “support free speech not attack American companies over garbage.”

European officials, for their part, insist the case is about enforcing EU law rather than policing political speech. In its press release, the Commission said the DSA is intended to protect users’ rights and ensure transparency around how major platforms operate, including how accounts are presented as verified, how ads are labeled and archived, and how researchers can study systemic online risks.

The dispute over X highlights a growing clash between U.S. political leaders skeptical of European regulation and EU policymakers determined to assert their authority over large digital platforms that operate across the bloc. X has 60 to 90 days, depending on the specific obligations, to detail how it will address the violations or face the possibility of additional penalties under the DSA.

Ce que les gens disent

Discussions on X portray the EU's €120 million fine on X under the DSA primarily as bureaucratic overreach and an assault on free speech, with Elon Musk demanding the EU's abolition and supporters celebrating X's surge to the top news app in every EU country. Critics defend the penalty as justified enforcement for deceptive blue checkmarks, ad opacity, and researcher data blocks, without curbing content. Skeptics highlight hypocrisy and censorship-by-proxy risks.

Articles connexes

Courtroom scene depicting X appealing a €120 million EU Digital Services Act fine, with lawyers, judges, and symbolic elements.
Image générée par IA

X conteste l'amende de 120 millions d'euros ($140 millions) de l'UE pour la loi sur les services numériques

Rapporté par l'IA Image générée par IA Vérifié par des faits

X a déclaré avoir fait appel d'une amende de 120 millions d'euros ($140 millions) infligée par la Commission européenne pour violations des obligations de transparence sous le Digital Services Act de l'UE, ce qui pourrait devenir le premier grand test judiciaire du nouveau recueil de règles pour les plateformes en ligne du bloc.

Les États-Unis ont averti de restrictions sur les principaux fournisseurs de services de l’Union européenne en représailles aux régulations technologiques de l’UE visant les entreprises américaines. Cette escalade fait suite à une amende de 140 millions de dollars infligée à X d’Elon Musk en vertu du Digital Services Act de l’UE, provoquant de vives critiques de l’administration Trump. Les responsables européens affirment que leurs règles garantissent un niveau de concurrence équitable pour toutes les entreprises.

Rapporté par l'IA

L’Union européenne a lancé une enquête formelle sur xAI d’Elon Musk suite à des préoccupations concernant la génération par son chatbot Grok d’images sexualisées sans consentement, y compris du matériel potentiel d’abus sexuel sur enfants. Les régulateurs examinent si l’entreprise a respecté le Digital Services Act pour atténuer les risques sur la plateforme X. Les amendes pourraient atteindre 6 % du chiffre d’affaires annuel mondial de xAI en cas de violations.

X, la plateforme de médias sociaux détenue par Elon Musk, se prépare à introduire des fonctionnalités permettant aux utilisateurs de négocier des actions et des cryptomonnaies directement depuis leurs timelines. Cela inclut les « Smart Cashtags » prévus pour un lancement imminent, ainsi qu'une bêta externe pour son système de paiements. Les annonces coïncident avec le soutien renouvelé de Musk pour Dogecoin, boostant son prix.

Rapporté par l'IA

L'administration Trump a annoncé des sanctions visa contre cinq personnalités européennes impliquées dans la régulation stricte de la tech, dont l'ancien commissaire français Thierry Breton, accusées de censure contre les intérêts américains. Paris a fermement dénoncé cette mesure, défendant la souveraineté numérique européenne. Cette décision s'inscrit dans une offensive plus large contre les règles de l'UE sur les plateformes en ligne.

Le réseau social X d'Elon Musk a invoqué une récente décision de la Cour suprême des États-Unis pour soutenir que les poursuites pour violation de droits d'auteur engagées par des éditeurs de musique à son encontre devraient être rejetées. La plateforme affirme que ce jugement infirme la théorie de la responsabilité contributive alléguée dans la plainte. Les éditeurs sont en désaccord mais ont accepté de suspendre la phase de procédure de communication des pièces (discovery) le temps de traiter la question par mémoires.

Rapporté par l'IA

The European Commission has preliminarily found TikTok's design addictive, violating EU digital laws and potentially leading to a fine of up to 6% of ByteDance's global revenue. The probe highlights risks to users' physical and mental well-being, particularly minors and vulnerable adults.

 

 

 

Ce site utilise des cookies

Nous utilisons des cookies pour l'analyse afin d'améliorer notre site. Lisez notre politique de confidentialité pour plus d'informations.
Refuser