Debate on restricting social media for minors advances in several countries

Several countries have implemented or debated measures to limit children's and teenagers' access to social media, citing impacts on mental health and privacy. In Argentina, experts emphasize the need for digital education and structural regulations beyond simple bans. The issue involves not only child protection but also the platforms' data-based business model.

In 2025 and 2026, countries like Australia imposed a total ban for those under 16, with fines for companies failing to verify age. Spain announced a similar measure, while France and Denmark advance limits, and the European Union debates a 'digital age of majority.' In Argentina, legislative projects exist along those lines, given the high screen penetration among minors.

Javier Pallero, a technology policy analyst, criticized the bans for arriving 'too late.' 'For years it was not considered an urgency, and when something arrives late and is legislated quickly, bad ideas like age verification are chosen,' he stated. Pallero warned that platforms, based on the 'extraction and exploitation of personal data,' could use verification to gather more information, such as biometrics, without altering their business model. This risks internet anonymity, essential for sensitive searches or criticisms, and could turn companies into 'a kind of civil registry' under state delegation, especially in authoritarian contexts.

Silvina Casablancas, a doctor in Pedagogy and specialist in Educational Technology, emphasized the school's role as a 'bulwark' for teaching digital citizenship. Based on FLACSO research on 9- to 12-year-olds, she found inequalities in protection tools, with none mentioning digital citizenship. 'The school is the ideal place to provide tools on how to protect oneself and grow in the digital society,' she said. She stressed family involvement and fostering critical thinking against algorithms and toxic content, like hate speech affecting adolescent identity.

Experts agree that restrictions mark a turning point, but without critical education and regulations on data protection and competition, measures will be mere patches. Argentine families show concern, recognizing that previous approaches no longer suffice.

Relaterade artiklar

French deputies applaud in the National Assembly after approving a ban on social media for under-15s and phones in schools.
Bild genererad av AI

French National Assembly adopts bill banning social media for under-15s and mobile phones in high schools

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The French National Assembly approved on January 26, 2026, a government-backed bill banning social media access for minors under 15 and prohibiting mobile phone use in high schools. Introduced by Renaissance deputy Laure Miller and accelerated by President Emmanuel Macron, the streamlined measure—focusing on parental controls for the riskiest platforms—aims to protect youth mental and physical health amid years of debate.

As countries like Australia and Spain advance bans on social media for children, the Philippines is now considering similar restrictions to protect youth from online risks, though no decision has been reached.

Rapporterad av AI

As Australia's groundbreaking ban on social media for minors under 16 takes effect—sparking Reddit's High Court challenge—experts debate its mental health benefits versus risks of driving use underground. The law targets platforms like TikTok and Instagram to curb harmful content exposure.

The Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund has raised concerns about the potential downsides of prohibiting social media access for children, following Australia's recent ban on use by those under 16. Experts emphasize the need for parental guidance and adherence to health guidelines rather than outright restrictions. South Africa is urged to carefully assess any similar measures.

Rapporterad av AI

Reddit har lämnat in en rättslig utmaning mot Australiens nya lag som förbjuder tillgång till sociala medier för personer under 16 år, och hävdar att den innebär inträngande verifiering och begränsar yttrandefriheten. Det San Francisco-baserade företaget meddelade högsta domstolens åtgärd på torsdagen, strax efter att ha infört åldersverifieringsåtgärder för att följa lagstiftningen som trädde i kraft på tisdagen. Förbudet riktar sig mot plattformar som TikTok, Facebook, Instagram och Reddit, med böter upp till 33 miljoner dollar vid bristande efterlevnad.

I en detaljerad inlämning till Högsta domstolen argumenterar Reddit att Australiens förbud mot sociala medier för under 16-åringar kränker konstitutionella rättigheter till fri politisk diskurs och felklassificerar plattformen, efter initial efterlevnad och efterföljande utmaningsmeddelande. Regeringen liknar stämningen vid Big Tobaccos motstånd, medan Reddit utnyttjar sina resurser på sin fjärde största marknad.

Rapporterad av AI

Australiska regulatorer är på väg att kräva att appbutiker blockerar AI-tjänster som saknar åldersverifiering för att skydda yngre användare från vuxet innehåll. Detta sker inför en deadline den 9 mars, med potentiella böter för icke-kompatibla AI-företag. Endast en bråkdel av regionens ledande AI-chattjänster har infört sådana åtgärder.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj