Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung begär interimistiskt beslut mot Dobrindt

Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung har lämnat in en ansökan om ett interimistiskt beslut till förvaltningsdomstolen i Karlsruhe. Stiftelsen anklagar inrikesministeriet under Alexander Dobrindt för fördröjningstaktik. Stiftelsen har väntat på sina anslag i månader.

Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung, som har kopplingar till AfD, lämnade in en ansökan om ett interimistiskt beslut i Karlsruhe på torsdagen. Anledningen är den pågående fördröjningen av utbetalningen av statliga medel från inrikesministeriet. Stiftelsen beklagar sig över myndighetens "fördröjningstaktik".

Lagen om finansiering av stiftelser anger inga tidsfrister för slutförandet av granskningsprocessen. Efter ett utslag i författningsdomstolen, som förklarade tidigare praxis författningsstridig, får etablerade partianknutna stiftelser cirka 600 miljoner euro årligen. Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung känner sig missgynnad.

Erika Steinbach, som är knuten till stiftelsen, hyllas i kommentarer för att vara tuff och orubblig. Kritiker ser de etablerade partiernas agerande som kartelliknande, i syfte att exkludera nya konkurrenter.

Relaterade artiklar

Realistic illustration of Cologne Administrative Court exterior with AfD supporters celebrating interim ruling against extremist classification, amid observing politicians.
Bild genererad av AI

Cologne court halts interim classification of AfD as confirmed right-wing extremist

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The Cologne Administrative Court has ruled in an expedited procedure that the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution may not classify the AfD as confirmed right-wing extremist for the time being. The decision is interim, and the main proceedings are still pending. Politicians from various parties are responding cautiously, while the AfD hails the ruling as a victory.

The Federal Interior Ministry will not appeal the Cologne Administrative Court's decision that the AfD cannot be classified as a secured right-wing extremist group for now. The party remains a suspected case in the right-wing extremist spectrum. A ruling in the main proceedings is still pending.

Rapporterad av AI

Following a partial legal victory for the AfD in court, Germany's Federal Interior Ministry is reviewing a domestic intelligence expert opinion on classifying the party as right-wing extremist. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has announced an in-depth examination that was not conducted under his predecessor Nancy Faeser. The Cologne Administrative Court has temporarily suspended the classification.

Following expulsion proceedings against ex-general secretary Jan Wenzel Schmidt, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) in Saxony-Anhalt faces fresh allegations of nepotism and cronyism, especially involving top candidate Ulrich Siegmund's family networks ahead of the September 2026 state election. Siegmund defends the hires as trustworthy, but the scandals threaten the party's poll lead and democratic norms.

Rapporterad av AI

Deutscher Städtetag president Burkhard Jung demands €30 billion annual immediate aid from the federal government for municipalities starting no later than 2027. He described the financial situation as catastrophic, with deficits exceeding €30 billion in recent years. Causes include rising social spending and declining revenues.

The office of the state attorney in South Africa has drawn criticism for its reluctance to pay cost orders totaling around R700,000 to conservationist Fred Daniel, following a landmark court ruling against state-sponsored corruption. This delay, amid a government appeal of a R306-million damages award, has led Daniel to enforce asset seizures from the Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency. Internal emails reveal ongoing pressure to settle the payments.

Rapporterad av AI

The Bavarian Administrative Court has declared two appearances by AfD politician Björn Höcke before the local elections in Bavaria permissible. The municipalities of Seybothenreuth and Lindenberg had tried to prevent him from speaking, but the court found no sufficient grounds for a ban. The decision protects freedom of speech.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj