Supreme Court declares right to walk on footpaths fundamental

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that every citizen has a fundamental right to walk on demarcated footpaths. The judgment holds that this right flows from constitutional guarantees of free movement, expression, assembly, association, and the right to life. It imposes a duty on public authorities to provide and maintain such infrastructure.

A bench of justices P.S. Narasimha and Atul S. Chandurkar delivered the ruling in a motor accident compensation case involving the death of a child pedestrian. The court stated that if a road exists, authorities must demarcate and maintain footpaths, with pedestrian rights taking precedence over motorised vehicles.

The judgment declared the right to walk integral to Article 19 and Article 21 of the Constitution. It makes the right judicially enforceable, allowing citizens to seek remedies including restitution and compensation from urban development authorities, municipal corporations, municipalities, and panchayats.

The court directed copies of the judgment to the ministries of housing and urban affairs, rural development, and road transport and highways. It also called for a regulatory body to protect pedestrian interests and urged the law commission to examine the required legal framework. The proceedings were renumbered as a petition under Article 32 titled “Re: Fundamental Right to Walk and Footpath”.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Odisha government to ensure all basic amenities for an octogenarian woman and her visually impaired son living in poverty in Subarnapur district.

The Union government on Monday notified the appointment of four high court chief justices and senior advocate V Mohana as Supreme Court judges.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

India's Supreme Court directed petitioners, including 65 on election duty in West Bengal whose names were deleted from the voter list after Special Intensive Revision (SIR), to approach appellate tribunals. The court refused their plea for immediate voting rights. It also praised the record 92.88% turnout and peaceful polling in the first phase.

The Constitutional Court has struck down provisions in the National Health Act that underpinned parts of the proposed National Health Insurance scheme, ruling them unconstitutional.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The Constitutional Court rejected several provisions of the Protected Schools Project promoted by the José Antonio Kast government. The norm prohibiting clothing that prevents facial identification survived scrutiny, except for the religious exception.

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ