Jharkhand high court seeks clarity on custodial death inquiries

The Jharkhand High Court has directed the state government to file a detailed affidavit clarifying whether mandatory judicial inquiries were conducted in nearly 450 custodial deaths reported between 2018 and 2025. This order came during a hearing on a public interest litigation filed in 2022. The court emphasized the need to ensure compliance with legal safeguards to rule out foul play.

The Jharkhand High Court has sought clarity from the state government on nearly 437 deaths in police and judicial custody reported between 2018 and 2025. A Division Bench of Chief Justice M S Sonak and Justice Rajesh Shankar issued this direction during a hearing on a public interest litigation filed in 2022. The petition annexed responses to a question raised in the state legislature, showing over 160 custodial deaths from 2018 to 2022.

The court referred to Section 176(1-A) of the CrPC, which mandates an inquiry by a Judicial Magistrate in cases of death or disappearance in police or court-authorised custody, in addition to the regular police investigation. The Bench also noted the provisions under Section 196 of the BNSS, which provide similar safeguards. It directed the Home Secretary to file an affidavit specifying in how many cases judicial inquiries were conducted, including details where they were not held. The affidavit must also clarify compliance with BNSS for deaths from 2023 to 2025, the nature and cause of each death, and adherence to National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) guidelines.

"All this is necessary because the affidavit filed or the chart accompanying the affidavit is not clear whether the cause of death has been determined by the police authorities themselves or whether the same is a result of any judicial inquiry as is contemplated under the law," the court observed.

Advocate Md. Shadab Ansari, appearing for the petitioner, stated, "When the broader data was placed, it showed that the number is extremely high, close to 450 deaths in police and judicial custody across Jharkhand." He alleged that police custody deaths are underreported, as authorities often disown cases by claiming escapes or other versions.

State counsel Gaurav Raj submitted that the court is examining whether magisterial inquiries were conducted and that clarification is needed on whether 'Magistrate' under CrPC and BNSS refers exclusively to a Judicial Magistrate or includes an Executive Magistrate. The High Court has set March 13, 2026, as the deadline for the detailed affidavit, with the next hearing on March 19.

Relaterede artikler

Illustration depicting Supreme Court judges ordering a freeze on West Bengal voter rolls, with iced documents symbolizing the directive.
Billede genereret af AI

Supreme Court orders freeze of West Bengal voter rolls

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

The Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to freeze West Bengal's voter rolls and publish the supplementary list by midnight after noting that adjudication of claims from voters deleted during the Special Intensive Revision was nearly complete. The court refused to set a deadline for appellate tribunals, stressing the need to freeze the lists now.

The Jharkhand high court ordered the removal of a Bokaro police station officer-in-charge on Thursday in a case of a minor girl missing for eight months. The court expressed concern over alleged police action against the girl's family members despite a prior restraining order. The girl went missing on July 21, 2025, after leaving home to submit an online form.

Rapporteret af AI

Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal informed the Lok Sabha that between 2016 and 2025, the Chief Justice of India's office received 8639 complaints against sitting judges. The highest number, 1170, were recorded in 2024 alone. The government clarified that such complaints are handled through the judiciary's in-house mechanism.

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to begin a preliminary inquiry into allegations that Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu's family received public contracts worth ₹1,270 crore from January 2015 to December 2025. The order addresses claims of corruption and nepotism in the awarding process.

Rapporteret af AI

The Supreme Court has set aside a Madras High Court order and restored the three-year sentence for two convicts in an attempt to murder case. The court described the practice of increasing victim compensation while reducing jail terms as dangerous. It also laid down guidelines for sentencing.

The Bombay High Court's Nagpur bench has ruled that mere marital discord cannot lead to abetment of suicide charges. In an order passed last week, the court quashed a 2019 Amravati case, stressing the need for direct instigation.

Rapporteret af AI

The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed displeasure over states' inadequate measures to address the stray dogs menace. The bench highlighted serious gaps in sterilisation, dog pounds, and removal of animals from institutional areas. It warned that chief secretaries could be summoned again if no tangible improvements are seen.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis