Permissibility provisions in crypto bill could expand bank activities

A proposed crypto market structure bill includes provisions that could significantly broaden the activities banks are legally allowed to pursue with digital assets, according to experts. While lobbyists debate restrictions on crypto rewards resembling yields, the permissibility section may have a larger impact on banking operations. This comes amid ongoing volatility in cryptocurrency markets.

The crypto market structure bill under discussion in Washington aims to clarify and expand the permissible activities for banks and their holding companies involving digital assets. Published on February 24, 2026, reports highlight that this legislation responds to differing regulatory approaches between the Biden and Trump administrations. Under Biden, regulators required banks to consult prudential overseers before engaging in cryptocurrency activities and adopted a cautious stance to limit risks.

In contrast, the bill's authors intend to codify Trump-era guidelines that have already eased restrictions, allowing banks greater involvement in crypto. David Portilla, co-head of Davis Polk's financial institutions practice, noted that statutory authorization provides durability against regulatory shifts. "What we learned between the change of administrations from Trump one to Biden and then Biden to Trump two is that the regulatory actions are not always durable, and so having the statutory authorization would provide that durability," Portilla said. He added that integrating such activities under federal supervision could enhance financial stability.

However, critics argue the bill's broad definition of "digital asset" might create loopholes. Graham Steele, a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute and former Treasury assistant secretary, warned that banks could reclassify impermissible assets by placing them on the blockchain. "All a bank or [bank holding company] would have to do would be put impermissible equities or assets on the blockchain, and it becomes permissible," Steele said. "This seems to potentially open a giant loophole in both the National Bank Act and Bank Holding Company Act restrictions on permissible activities."

Hilary Allen, a bank law professor at American University, echoed these concerns: "It's absolutely something to be concerned about. It essentially eviscerates the banking laws by saying, basically, if you put anything on the blockchain, it inherently becomes a permissible bank activity."

The debate over yield-like rewards has stalled progress, with banks seeking broad prohibitions on crypto firms offering such incentives, while crypto interests push for allowances like subscription programs for stablecoins. A recent White House meeting between stakeholders yielded no public agreement. Meanwhile, bitcoin's price has dropped about 50% since October, mirroring a parallel decline in the overall crypto market value, underscoring the volatility that earlier regulators sought to contain.

Relaterede artikler

Senators Grassley and Durbin scrutinize crypto bill amid jurisdiction clash, with blockchain and law enforcement symbols.
Billede genereret af AI

Senate judiciary leaders challenge crypto bill's jurisdiction

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

Senate Judiciary Committee leaders Chuck Grassley and Dick Durbin have raised concerns about a provision in a cryptocurrency market structure bill led by Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott, arguing it encroaches on their committee's jurisdiction. The dispute centers on exemptions for crypto software developers, which they say could hinder law enforcement efforts against money laundering. The bill's markup has been postponed amid this opposition and industry pushback.

Citi analysts report growing momentum for the CLARITY Act, a key U.S. crypto market structure bill, but highlight risks of delays beyond 2026 due to disputes over decentralized finance definitions and stablecoin rewards. The Senate Agriculture Committee has advanced its version, while the Banking Committee grapples with contentious issues. A White House meeting on February 2 aims to address stablecoin concerns.

Rapporteret af AI

A delay in passing U.S. crypto market structure legislation is limiting valuation growth for American-exposed crypto firms, according to Benchmark analyst Mark Palmer. The holdup prolongs regulatory uncertainty amid rising global adoption, though bitcoin and infrastructure plays remain relatively insulated. Palmer still expects the bill to pass, albeit possibly later than anticipated.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called on Congress to pass the Clarity Act this spring to provide regulatory clarity for digital assets amid market volatility. Speaking in interviews, he highlighted the bill's potential to stabilize markets and noted ongoing negotiations between crypto firms and banks. The legislation faces deadlock over issues like stablecoin rules, with a March 1 deadline for agreement.

Rapporteret af AI

Under the Trump administration, U.S. regulators have shifted toward integrating cryptocurrency into the traditional financial system, marking a historic change from prior enforcement-heavy approaches. Key developments include new legislation for stablecoins and approvals for crypto firms to operate like banks. This evolution has boosted institutional adoption amid Bitcoin's volatile but upward price trajectory.

The White House convened its second closed-door meeting with cryptocurrency and banking industry representatives to address disputes over stablecoin yields in the stalled CLARITY Act. The discussions focused on resolving tensions that have halted the bill's progress in the Senate. Banking groups emphasized the need for innovation without risking bank deposits.

Rapporteret af AI

A White House summit on February 2, 2026, aimed to bridge gaps between banking and crypto industries over stablecoin rewards but ended without agreement. Patrick Witt, the president's digital assets adviser, emphasized that ethics provisions targeting President Trump remain unacceptable. Negotiations continue amid Democratic demands for stricter rules on officials' crypto involvement.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis