Dramatic illustration of Spain's Supreme Court condemning the Attorney General for leaking secrets in Ayuso case, with Ayuso celebrating political victory.
Dramatic illustration of Spain's Supreme Court condemning the Attorney General for leaking secrets in Ayuso case, with Ayuso celebrating political victory.
Billede genereret af AI

Supreme Court condemns attorney general for revealing secrets in Ayuso case

Billede genereret af AI

Spain's Supreme Court has sentenced Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz to two years of disqualification for revealing secrets in the case involving Isabel Díaz Ayuso's boyfriend. The ruling, not yet drafted, relates to the leak of information about a tax plea deal for Alberto González Amador. Ayuso hails the decision as a political victory against the government.

Spain's Supreme Court has condemned Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for revealing secrets, in a ruling advanced on Thursday related to the tax fraud case of Alberto González Amador, partner of Madrid President Isabel Díaz Ayuso. The penalty includes two years of disqualification and a 7,200 euro fine, according to judicial sources. The court argues that García Ortiz leaked an email about a plea deal in the proceedings against Amador, debunking false information spread by Ayuso's chief of staff, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez (MAR).

Rodríguez messaged Amador after the sentence: 'Congratulations, you've destroyed them.' Ayuso, in a press conference, framed the ruling as a victory weakening Pedro Sánchez's government, stating 'it's not the attorney general, but Sánchez who sat in the dock.' Within the PP, the win bolsters her leadership against Alberto Núñez Feijóo, though it sparks internal suspicions.

From the G20 in South Africa, Sánchez defended García Ortiz's innocence, regretting the sentence he accepts but disagrees with. He pointed to the Constitutional Court to address 'controversial aspects' and ruled out a pardon. The government begins the process to appoint a successor with a 'distinguished legal career.'

Hundreds gathered outside the Supreme Court in support of the attorney general, chanting 'innocent' and decrying a 'political maneuver.' Figures like Baltasar Garzón and Dolores Delgado attended, calling the ruling 'unjust.' The sentence, awaiting drafting, caps a controversial trial dividing Spanish politics.

Hvad folk siger

X discussions on the Supreme Court's condemnation of Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for revealing secrets in the Ayuso case reveal sharp polarization. Right-leaning users celebrate it as proof of institutional abuse by the government against Ayuso, emphasizing leaked evidence and deleted data. Left-leaning voices, including protests outside the Supreme Court, denounce it as conservative judicial lawfare protecting Ayuso's partner, with cries of 'Ayuso dimisión' and claims of innocence. Sánchez affirmed belief in Ortiz's innocence and hinted at a Constitutional appeal. High-engagement posts from journalists and public figures highlight MAR's celebratory message to Amador and ongoing debates over proof and motivation.

Relaterede artikler

Dramatic courtroom illustration of Spain's Supreme Court convicting ex-Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for leaking data on Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner's tax fraud case.
Billede genereret af AI

Supreme Court convicts attorney general for leaking Ayuso's partner's data

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

The Supreme Court has convicted former Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for revealing confidential data on the procedural status of Alberto González Amador, partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, accused of tax fraud. The ruling finds proven a leak to the press and dissemination via an official rectification note. Pedro Sánchez has defended García Ortiz, stating he acted to defend the truth.

In Spain's Supreme Court, several journalists testified that they learned of an email regarding the tax fraud of Isabel Díaz Ayuso's boyfriend before Álvaro García Ortiz received it. The testimonies bolster the attorney general's defense in the revelation of secrets trial. The November 11, 2025 session featured tensions in interrogations.

Rapporteret af AI

Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz denied before Judge Ángel Hurtado leaking a confidential email from Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner in a tax fraud case. Alberto González Amador and Miguel Ángel Rodríguez also testified, revealing details on authorizations and hoaxes in the proceedings. The statements highlight tensions in the Prosecutor's Office and prior leaks in the case.

Spain's National Court has scheduled a trial for September 2027 against former Madrid regional vice president Ignacio González and four others for alleged contract rigging related to a golf course at the Canal de Isabel II. This case is part of the broader Lezo investigation, focusing on benefits gained by the politician's relatives between 2006 and 2012. Prosecutors seek six years in prison for González, while Madrid's regional government requests 16 years.

Rapporteret af AI

The Provincial Court of Madrid has revoked Judge Juan Carlos Peinado's order to collect all emails of Begoña Gómez from 2018 to 2025. The magistrates deem the measure lacks proper justification and violates principles of proportionality and necessity. However, the court upholds the embezzlement charges against Gómez and her assistant.

The Chamber of Deputies unanimously approved the admissibility of the constitutional accusation against suspended Supreme Court Justice Diego Simpértegui, with 132 votes in favor. The libel, pushed by ruling-party deputies, is based on three chapters regarding breaches of probity in key judicial cases. The Senate will now decide the case on December 22, potentially removing him from office if approved by a majority.

Rapporteret af AI

The Prosecutor's Office has requested full absolution for doctor David Cangrejo and eleven other individuals involved in an alleged electoral corruption case in Neiva. After a decade of investigations, the evidence failed to overcome the presumption of innocence. The proceedings, started in 2016, collapsed due to insufficient proof.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis