Dramatic illustration of Spain's Supreme Court condemning the Attorney General for leaking secrets in Ayuso case, with Ayuso celebrating political victory.
Bild generiert von KI

Supreme Court condemns attorney general for revealing secrets in Ayuso case

Bild generiert von KI

Spain's Supreme Court has sentenced Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz to two years of disqualification for revealing secrets in the case involving Isabel Díaz Ayuso's boyfriend. The ruling, not yet drafted, relates to the leak of information about a tax plea deal for Alberto González Amador. Ayuso hails the decision as a political victory against the government.

Spain's Supreme Court has condemned Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for revealing secrets, in a ruling advanced on Thursday related to the tax fraud case of Alberto González Amador, partner of Madrid President Isabel Díaz Ayuso. The penalty includes two years of disqualification and a 7,200 euro fine, according to judicial sources. The court argues that García Ortiz leaked an email about a plea deal in the proceedings against Amador, debunking false information spread by Ayuso's chief of staff, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez (MAR).

Rodríguez messaged Amador after the sentence: 'Congratulations, you've destroyed them.' Ayuso, in a press conference, framed the ruling as a victory weakening Pedro Sánchez's government, stating 'it's not the attorney general, but Sánchez who sat in the dock.' Within the PP, the win bolsters her leadership against Alberto Núñez Feijóo, though it sparks internal suspicions.

From the G20 in South Africa, Sánchez defended García Ortiz's innocence, regretting the sentence he accepts but disagrees with. He pointed to the Constitutional Court to address 'controversial aspects' and ruled out a pardon. The government begins the process to appoint a successor with a 'distinguished legal career.'

Hundreds gathered outside the Supreme Court in support of the attorney general, chanting 'innocent' and decrying a 'political maneuver.' Figures like Baltasar Garzón and Dolores Delgado attended, calling the ruling 'unjust.' The sentence, awaiting drafting, caps a controversial trial dividing Spanish politics.

Was die Leute sagen

X discussions on the Supreme Court's condemnation of Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for revealing secrets in the Ayuso case reveal sharp polarization. Right-leaning users celebrate it as proof of institutional abuse by the government against Ayuso, emphasizing leaked evidence and deleted data. Left-leaning voices, including protests outside the Supreme Court, denounce it as conservative judicial lawfare protecting Ayuso's partner, with cries of 'Ayuso dimisión' and claims of innocence. Sánchez affirmed belief in Ortiz's innocence and hinted at a Constitutional appeal. High-engagement posts from journalists and public figures highlight MAR's celebratory message to Amador and ongoing debates over proof and motivation.

Verwandte Artikel

Dramatic courtroom illustration of Spain's Supreme Court convicting ex-Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for leaking data on Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner's tax fraud case.
Bild generiert von KI

Supreme Court convicts attorney general for leaking Ayuso's partner's data

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

The Supreme Court has convicted former Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for revealing confidential data on the procedural status of Alberto González Amador, partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, accused of tax fraud. The ruling finds proven a leak to the press and dissemination via an official rectification note. Pedro Sánchez has defended García Ortiz, stating he acted to defend the truth.

In Spain's Supreme Court, several journalists testified that they learned of an email regarding the tax fraud of Isabel Díaz Ayuso's boyfriend before Álvaro García Ortiz received it. The testimonies bolster the attorney general's defense in the revelation of secrets trial. The November 11, 2025 session featured tensions in interrogations.

Von KI berichtet

Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz denied before Judge Ángel Hurtado leaking a confidential email from Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner in a tax fraud case. Alberto González Amador and Miguel Ángel Rodríguez also testified, revealing details on authorizations and hoaxes in the proceedings. The statements highlight tensions in the Prosecutor's Office and prior leaks in the case.

Das Dritte Mündliche Strafgericht in Santiago hat acht Angeklagte im SQM-Fall per Mehrheitsbeschluss freigesprochen, darunter den ehemaligen Senator Pablo Longueira und den Kandidaten Marco Enríquez-Ominami, und kritisierte die Dauer des Verfahrens sowie die Qualität der Beweise der Staatsanwaltschaft. Das Urteil hebt eine Verletzung des Rechts auf ein zeitnahes Verfahren nach 11 Jahren Untersuchung und einem dreijährigen Prozess hervor. Das Urteil wird im August 2026 verkündet und lässt Raum für eine Nichtigkeitsberufung.

Von KI berichtet

The National Audience judge has granted provisional release to Vicente Fernández, Leire Díez, and Antxon Alonso, investigated for allegedly rigging public contracts in exchange for commissions. The UCO attributes to the trio the use of influence to secure aids and awards worth over 132 million euros between 2021 and 2023. The three are subject to precautionary measures while the case remains under secrecy.

Former PSOE militant Leire Díez has told Judge Arturo Zamarriego that she held two meetings with Santos Cerdán in April 2024 as a journalist to inform on Villarejo case matters. Alongside businessman Javier Pérez-Dolset, both deny party ties and seek to nullify recordings where Díez presents herself as Cerdán's 'right hand'. The probe examines alleged influence peddling and bribery to obtain compromising information.

Von KI berichtet

Die Prüfungskommission der Abgeordnetenkammer hob ungewöhnlich die einstimmige Abstimmung zur Genehmigung der Verfassungsanklage gegen den Richter des Obersten Gerichts Diego Simpértegui aufgrund eines Fehlers bei der Übergabe wichtiger Dokumente auf. Die Kommissionspräsidentin Maite Orsini entschied, die Abstimmung am Donnerstag zu wiederholen, nachdem sie bestätigt hatte, dass ein entscheidendes Beweismittel pünktlich eingetroffen war, aber nicht gemeldet wurde. Dies verschiebt die Plenarsitzung bis nächsten Montag.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen