Fredag annoncerede Tidö-partierne en pause i ungdomsudvisninger i afventning af lovændringer. Migrationsverket stopper straks gennemgang af sager for personer op til 21 år, men mange unge undrer sig over, om det gælder dem. Advokater fremhæver usikkerheder i forslagene.
Tidö-partierne, der danner den svenske regering, afholdt fredag den 6. marts 2026 en pressekonference, hvor de annoncerede flere foreslåede lovændringer i migrationspolitikken. Blandt dem sættes ungdomsudvisninger – udvisninger af unge voksne, der er vokset op i Sverige, men som er nægtet opholdstilladelse efter de fyldte 18 – på pause indtil en permanent løsning er på plads. The Migration Agency announced shortly after the press conference that it is halting reviews of such cases for individuals up to 21 years old. Migration Minister Johan Forssell (M) emphasizes that this is not a temporary panic solution, as demanded by the opposition, but part of a permanent legislative change expected to be approved by parliament. “We have said the same thing all along. This problem has existed in Sweden for ten years and now it is high time for a permanent solution,” Forssell says. The opposition has previously proposed pauses on these deportations, but these were voted down by the Tidö parties. Just a few days ago, Forssell stated that such a pause was not on the table. According to the minister, the difference is that the opposition's demands would require a formal law that takes longer to implement, whereas the government's proposal directly addresses the root of the issue. Despite the announcement, uncertainty persists. 21-year-old Ayla Rostami expresses concern: “I don't know if it will apply to me too.” Lawyer Louise Dane at the Asylum Rights Center points to questions surrounding the proposed “safety valve” for residence permits. “What kind of valve are they thinking of? They wouldn't answer that,” she says. Previous proposals on dependency relationships are deemed insufficient for most cases. For those already deported, such as sisters Donya and Darya Javid Gonbadi who were forced to leave Sweden despite acceptance to nursing programs, the change does not apply retroactively. They must reapply. Individuals with rejections who are still in Sweden may be affected if they appeal, as new circumstances from the law change could be considered. The government also presented other changes, such as facilitating extensions of work permits for track-changers and exceptions for shortage occupations in care and welfare. Dane criticizes the government for not heeding referral bodies earlier, which could have avoided the current situation.
