DOJ appeals contempt order against army lawyer in immigration case

The U.S. Department of Justice has asked the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate a contempt order issued by U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino against an army lawyer handling an immigration case. The order aimed to enforce compliance with a habeas ruling for a detained Mexican man in Minnesota. DOJ argues the judge improperly held the lawyer's career captive to pressure ICE.

U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino, a Biden appointee, ordered in early February the release of Rigoberto Soto Jimenez from ICE custody in El Paso, Texas, and his return to Minnesota, where he has lived since 2018 with his lawful permanent resident spouse. The judge deemed Jimenez unlawfully detained. After his release without his Minnesota driver's license, Mexican Consulate ID, or transport back to Minnesota, more than a week passed without full compliance. During a February 18 show-cause hearing, special assistant U.S. attorney Matthew Isihara, from the Army's Judge Advocate General's Corps and filling in amid office shortages, apologized, saying the matter fell 'through the cracks' while he managed 130 cases during Operation Metro Surge and resignations at the U.S. Attorney's Office. Provinzino held Isihara in civil contempt, imposing a $500 daily coercive fine starting February 20 until compliance was confirmed. The next day, ICE returned Jimenez's property, purging the contempt without any fines paid, as noted in DOJ's appellate filing. On Monday, DOJ petitioned the 8th Circuit to overturn the order, calling it 'manifestly improper.' The filing states Provinzino 'held' Isihara's career 'captive' and subjected him to potential 'permanent professional consequences' to coerce ICE, an agency he does not control. 'Mr. Isihara and his legal career were wrongfully held captive to induce ICE's compliance,' DOJ asserted. The department urged the appeals court to prevent district judges from using personal-capacity contempt against government attorneys as a 'weapon' to influence agencies like ICE. This follows similar tensions, including a DHS attorney previously requesting contempt to rest and the chief judge criticizing DOJ superiors for creating impossible situations.

Verwandte Artikel

Illustration of Supreme Court vacating D.C. Circuit ruling in Steve Bannon contempt case, clearing path for dismissal.
Bild generiert von KI

Supreme Court vacates D.C. Circuit ruling in Steve Bannon contempt case, clearing path for dismissal

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI Fakten geprüft

The U.S. Supreme Court on April 6 vacated a federal appeals court decision upholding Steve Bannon’s criminal contempt of Congress conviction and sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, a move that—at the Justice Department’s request—could allow the Trump administration to seek dismissal of the prosecution. Bannon previously served a four-month prison sentence for defying a subpoena from the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.

Chief U.S. District Judge Patrick J. Schiltz has warned of criminal contempt proceedings against the Trump administration for repeated violations of court orders in immigration cases. The judge expressed frustration over the government's failure to comply with directives related to ICE detentions following Operation Metro Surge. This comes amid overwhelming caseloads for federal attorneys handling the fallout.

Von KI berichtet

A federal judge in Minnesota has held the Trump administration in contempt for violating a court order by transferring a Mexican detainee out of state before his release. The ruling requires reimbursement for the man's return airfare after Immigration and Customs Enforcement released him in Texas, far from his home. The decision highlights ongoing legal challenges to immigration enforcement practices.

A federal judge in Florida appointed by President Donald Trump has shifted his stance on the detention of immigrants, now following a recent appeals court ruling that grants bond hearings in certain cases.

Von KI berichtet

Former FBI Director James Comey has told a federal appeals court that the Department of Justice cannot salvage its case against him due to an unlawful appointment of a prosecutor. Comey accuses the DOJ of hypocrisy, contrasting its stance here with its position in a prior Trump case. The dispute centers on Attorney General Pam Bondi's appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. attorney.

Nine defendants are on trial in federal court in Fort Worth over a July 4, 2025 protest outside the Prairieland ICE detention center in Alvarado, Texas, that ended with a police officer being shot. Prosecutors say the demonstrators operated as a coordinated “North Texas antifa cell” and have pursued terrorism-related counts alongside charges such as attempted murder and rioting—an approach the defense disputes and that legal analysts say could shape how courts handle protest activity and group-label evidence.

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen