Supreme Court to begin oral arguments on budget insertions April 7

The Supreme Court will begin oral arguments tomorrow on petitions challenging the legality of unprogrammed appropriations and special accounts in the national budget. The hearings are set at the Session Hall in Padre Faura, Manila, starting at 9:30 a.m.

The consolidated petitions challenge provisions in the 2024, 2025, and 2026 General Appropriations Acts related to unprogrammed funds and special accounts in the General Fund. Petitioners include the late Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman, former Sen. Koko Pimentel, former House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, civic groups, and other lawmakers. They argue that Congress inserted or expanded budget allocations through bicameral conference committees beyond constitutional limits, including hundreds of billions of pesos in unprogrammed appropriations.

Separate petitions also question adjustments to special accounts, including those tied to infrastructure spending, and provisions in the 2026 budget allowing continued use of unprogrammed funds. The first hearing is tomorrow, April 7, with another on April 21.

In context, the Supreme Court has relocated its summer sessions from Baguio to Manila from April 6 to 30 due to rising fuel prices. Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo said the move followed consultation with the full bench to remain mindful of national conditions while delivering justice. The oral arguments will proceed as scheduled.

Verwandte Artikel

House justice committee holds first impeachment hearing for VP Sara Duterte without her or lawyers present, focusing on procedural agenda and audit evidence.
Bild generiert von KI

House proceeds with VP Sara Duterte impeachment hearing on March 25

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

The House justice committee proceeds with the first impeachment hearing against Vice President Sara Duterte on March 25, 2026, despite her and her lawyers' absence. The agenda includes ground rules, pending motions, subpoenas, and witnesses for the April 14 public hearing. Officials stress the proceedings are evidence-based from official audit findings.

The Supreme Court held its first oral arguments on April 7 on petitions challenging unprogrammed appropriations in the 2024, 2025, and 2026 national budgets. Invited experts as amici curiae presented divided views on their legality and implications. Some warned of weakened transparency, while others defended their necessity.

Von KI berichtet

The Senate is prepared to defend the constitutionality of unprogrammed appropriations (UA) in the 2026 national budget, which has been challenged before the Supreme Court. The petition was filed by Caloocan Rep. Edgar Erice and Mamamayang Liberal party-list Rep. Leila de Lima, seeking a temporary restraining order against its use. Senate President Vicente Sotto III expressed confidence that the court will uphold the budget.

Following the bicameral committee's approval of the P6.793-trillion 2026 General Appropriations Bill, Senate and House leaders signed the conference committee report on Friday at the Philippine International Convention Center. The move paves the way for ratification on Saturday and transmission to President Marcos for approval.

Von KI berichtet

Lawmakers hit back at a Supreme Court petition by Vice President Sara Duterte's allies seeking to block her ongoing impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives. The move comes after the House justice committee advanced two complaints to hearings.

The Marcos administration has begun 2026 operating under the reenacted 2025 budget, as President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. continues reviewing the P6.793-trillion 2026 General Appropriations Bill received from Congress last week. Officials assure minimal disruption, echoing prior statements on the brief delay.

Von KI berichtet

Die Kammer des Senats hat einstimmig mit 31 Stimmen für die Verfassungsreform gestimmt, die den Richterernennungsrat schafft und die richterliche Governance modifiziert. Das Gesetzesvorhaben, das die Regierung im Oktober 2024 nach dem Skandal um den Audio-Fall vorantrieb, zielt darauf ab, radikale Änderungen bei der Richterauswahl und der richterlichen Verwaltung einzuführen. Senatoren aus verschiedenen Parteien unterstützten die Initiative, forderten jedoch Anpassungen zur Verfeinerung.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen