Realistic depiction of Ten Commandments display in a Louisiana classroom following 5th Circuit's 12-6 ruling to lift injunction.
Realistic depiction of Ten Commandments display in a Louisiana classroom following 5th Circuit's 12-6 ruling to lift injunction.
Image generated by AI

En banc 5th Circuit lifts injunction against Louisiana Ten Commandments classroom-display law

Image generated by AI
Fact checked

The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit voted 12-6 to lift a preliminary injunction that had kept Louisiana’s 2024 law requiring Ten Commandments displays in public classrooms from taking effect, saying key details about how the requirement will be implemented remain unclear and the constitutional challenge is premature.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, sitting en banc, on Friday lifted a preliminary injunction that had blocked Louisiana from enforcing a 2024 law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms.

The court voted 12-6 to vacate the injunction, concluding that the record still lacks critical implementation details needed to assess the Establishment Clause questions at the preliminary stage. The majority said it is not yet clear how prominently the displays will be placed, whether teachers will incorporate the text into instruction, or whether schools will also post related materials the law contemplates—such as historical documents including the Mayflower Compact or the Declaration of Independence.

The ruling follows earlier litigation in which a lower court blocked the law and a three-judge 5th Circuit panel held the measure unconstitutional. After the case was taken up by the full court, that panel decision was set aside and the en banc court issued the new ruling lifting the injunction.

In a concurring opinion, Judge James Ho praised the law in sweeping terms, writing that it is constitutional and consistent with the nation’s traditions. In dissent, Judge James L. Dennis said the statute amounts to government endorsement of religion in settings where students are required to attend school, calling it the kind of establishment the Constitution’s framers sought to prevent.

Louisiana’s Republican governor, Jeff Landry, welcomed the decision, posting: “Common sense is making a comeback!” State Attorney General Liz Murrill has also pointed schools to sample displays that she says would comply with the statute.

Civil liberties groups opposing the law—including the ACLU of Louisiana and the Freedom From Religion Foundation—criticized the decision and said they expect the legal fight to continue, warning that implementation could trigger further litigation over how individual districts carry out the requirement. The lawsuit challenging the law includes a mix of families and other plaintiffs who argue the mandate pressures students and violates the separation of church and state.

The decision comes as other Republican-led states pursue similar measures. Arkansas has faced a federal legal challenge to its own Ten Commandments classroom-display requirements, and Texas enacted a classroom-display law that took effect on Sept. 1, 2025.

Past Supreme Court decisions have set key markers in the debate. In 1980, the court struck down a Kentucky law requiring the Ten Commandments in classrooms, finding it lacked a secular legislative purpose. In 2005, the court issued split rulings on Ten Commandments displays—rejecting certain courthouse exhibits in Kentucky while upholding a longstanding Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the Texas state Capitol.

What people are saying

Reactions on X to the 5th Circuit's en banc decision lifting the injunction on Louisiana's Ten Commandments classroom display law are predominantly positive from conservative accounts, viewing it as a win for faith, tradition, and against 'activist judges.' Neutral reports from journalists highlight the 12-6 vote and prematurity of the challenge. Negative sentiments express outrage over church-state separation violations, though with lower engagement.

Related Articles

Federal appeals court judges rule in favor of Hobby Distillers Association, striking down U.S. ban on home distilling.
Image generated by AI

US appeals court strikes down Reconstruction-era federal ban on home distilling as unconstitutional

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled that a longstanding federal prohibition on distilling spirits at home cannot be justified as an exercise of Congress’s taxing power, siding with the Hobby Distillers Association and four of its members.

A divided panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has endorsed the Trump administration's reinterpretation of a 1996 immigration law, allowing mandatory detention without bond for unauthorized immigrants already in the United States. The 2-1 decision, issued on a recent Friday, applies to Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, advancing plans for large-scale detention facilities. This ruling supports the administration's mass deportation efforts amid ongoing legal challenges.

Reported by AI

The US Supreme Court has issued a preliminary ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta, reinstating an injunction against California school policies that conceal students' gender transitions from parents. The decision upholds parents' constitutional rights to direct their children's upbringing, particularly in matters affecting mental health like gender dysphoria. The ruling comes amid ongoing debates over parental involvement in schools.

Judge Lawrence VanDyke wrote a sharply worded dissent after the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to rehear a dispute involving Olympus Spa, a women-only Korean spa in Washington state, and the state’s ban on gender-identity discrimination in public accommodations. His language, including a crude opening phrase, drew a rare written rebuke from a large group of fellow Ninth Circuit judges.

Reported by AI

The Trump administration has dropped its appeal in Rhode Island v. Trump, upholding a federal judge's order to halt the dismantling of the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Judge John J. McConnell issued a permanent injunction in November, requiring the restoration of grant funding after the agency lost more than half its staff. The decision preserves operations for the federal agency supporting public libraries and museums.

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline