Federal courthouse in El Paso with Texas map overlay showing blocked congressional redistricting due to racial gerrymander ruling.
Image generated by AI

Federal court blocks Texas’ new congressional map, orders return to 2021 lines for 2026

Image generated by AI
Fact checked

On November 18, 2025, a three-judge federal panel in El Paso blocked Texas from using its newly redrawn U.S. House map in the 2026 midterms, finding the plan was likely a racial gerrymander and directing the state to revert to its 2021 districts while appeals proceed.

A divided three-judge court ruled 2–1 that Texas’ 2025 congressional map cannot be used next year, concluding that race—not only politics—predominated the mid‑decade redraw. The majority said plaintiffs were likely to succeed on their racial‑gerrymandering claims and ordered the state to default to the 2021 map for the 2026 elections unless a higher court intervenes. According to the Associated Press, the opinion was authored by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey V. Brown, a Trump appointee, and joined by Senior U.S. District Judge David C. Guaderrama, an Obama appointee; Fifth Circuit Judge Jerry E. Smith, a Reagan appointee, dissented. (AP)

The 160‑page opinion focuses heavily on a July letter from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division under President Donald Trump. Harmeet Dhillon, then the division’s chief, told Texas officials that four congressional districts with non‑white majorities were unconstitutional “coalition districts” that should be dismantled. Judge Brown called DOJ’s assertion “legally incorrect” and criticized the letter as riddled with “factual, legal, and typographical errors,” noting that state leaders cited it when adding redistricting to a special legislative session and when directing lawmakers to redraw districts “based on race.” (AP; ABC17 News)

Case and panel details
- The ruling came in League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. Abbott, one of several consolidated challenges to Texas’ congressional plans. ACLU and other civil‑rights groups filed amicus briefs supporting an injunction. (ACLU; American Redistricting Project)
- The panel held nearly two weeks of hearings in El Paso in October before issuing Tuesday’s order. (AP)

What the 2025 map would have done
- Republicans designed the mid‑decade map to add up to five GOP‑leaning seats, in part by eliminating five “coalition” districts where minority groups together form a majority of the voting‑age population. The plan also would have reduced the number of districts where minorities are a majority of voting‑age citizens from 16 to 14. (AP)
- Texas Republicans argued the redraw was a permissible partisan gerrymander; the court said substantial evidence showed racial sorting drove key line‑drawing decisions. (AP; Reuters)

How Texas got here
- Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session on July 9, 2025, soon after DOJ’s letter, and Democrats later broke quorum by leaving the state before ultimately returning as the map advanced. (Texas Governor’s office; Washington Post/AP; Texas Tribune)
- The DOJ letter relied on the Fifth Circuit’s 2024 en banc decision in Petteway v. Galveston County, which held that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act does not require “coalition districts.” The court in Tuesday’s ruling said Texas misread Petteway as a command to dismantle such districts and, in any event, used race impermissibly to do so. (Washington Post; Texas Tribune; Politico 2024)

Reactions and next steps
- Abbott called the ruling “clearly erroneous,” saying the Legislature redrew maps “to better reflect Texans’ conservative voting preferences — and for no other reason,” and vowed a swift appeal. Texas can appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. (AP/Washington Post)
- Daily Wire reported that Rep. Greg Casar (D‑Texas), whose district was targeted in the redraw, said, “The Trump‑Abbott maps are clearly illegal… If this decision stands, I look forward to running for reelection in my current district.” (Daily Wire)

National stakes
- The decision is a setback for a broader mid‑decade redistricting push encouraged by Trump in GOP‑led states. In Indiana, Republicans have recently backed away from holding a special session after internal resistance, despite White House pressure. (Reuters; AP)
- In response to GOP moves, California voters earlier this month approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure adopting a new congressional map that analysts say could net Democrats up to five seats; the Trump Justice Department has joined a lawsuit challenging that plan as a racial gerrymander. (AP; Reuters; Los Angeles Times)

Election calendar pressure
- Texas officials warned of tight timelines. Candidate filing for the March 3, 2026 primary runs through 6 p.m. on December 8, 2025, raising the stakes of any request for a stay from the Supreme Court. (Texas Secretary of State)

What’s unchanged — and what’s next
- Tuesday’s order does not permanently resolve the merits; it preserves the status quo while litigation continues. Unless the Supreme Court stays the injunction or reverses, Texas will use its 2021 congressional lines in 2026. Appeals are expected imminently, and the Court’s rulings in related redistricting cases this term could shape the outcome here as well. (AP; Reuters)

What people are saying

Reactions on X to the federal court's ruling blocking Texas's new congressional map for 2026 midterms are divided along partisan lines. Supporters of the decision, including Democrats and voting rights advocates, praise it as a crucial check against racial gerrymandering that preserves fair representation. Critics, mainly Republicans, condemn it as biased judicial interference favoring Democrats and express confidence in a successful Supreme Court appeal. Neutral posts from journalists focus on the factual details and potential electoral implications, while skepticism arises over inconsistent application of redistricting rules across states.

Related Articles

Realistic illustration of Texas congressional map redrawn to favor Republicans, with subtle signs of potential future Democratic gains, Supreme Court gavel in view.
Image generated by AI

Texas redistricting bolsters GOP map but leaves room for future Democratic gains

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

Republicans in Texas approved new congressional maps in 2025 designed to secure as many as five additional U.S. House seats in 2026, a plan the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated this month. While Democrats have suffered a string of statewide losses, some analysts argue the state could still move toward greater competitiveness over time, drawing cautious parallels to California’s political realignment in the 1990s.

The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily halted a lower court ruling that found Texas’s new congressional map likely racially gerrymandered, allowing the map to remain in place while the justices consider the case. The plan, advanced under former President Donald Trump and backed by Texas Republican leaders, is expected to add several GOP‑leaning seats. Democratic Congressman Lloyd Doggett, whose district has repeatedly been reshaped, has decided to run for reelection amid the uncertainty.

Reported by AI Fact checked

The U.S. Supreme Court has sided with Texas Republicans in a dispute over the state’s new congressional map, allowing the plan to take effect and drawing fresh scrutiny over partisan gerrymandering ahead of the next round of federal elections.

A federal judge has ordered special elections for the Mississippi Supreme Court after ruling that the state's electoral map violates voting rights. The decision stems from a lawsuit claiming the map dilutes Black voters' influence. New elections could occur as early as November 2026.

Reported by AI Fact checked

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has appointed two three-judge circuit court panels to hear lawsuits challenging the state’s Republican-favoring congressional map. A conservative justice’s dissent defending the existing districts relied on a mischaracterization of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Elections Clause.

A Republican bid to redraw New Hampshire’s congressional lines has been shelved after state Sen. Dan Innis withdrew his bill, citing opposition from Gov. Kelly Ayotte. The move underscores the limits of the White House’s pressure campaign to secure more GOP-leaning House seats ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Reported by AI

Virginia Democrats have filed an emergency motion with the state Court of Appeals to reverse a judge's ruling that halted a proposed constitutional amendment on redistricting. The amendment could reshape congressional districts to favor Democrats significantly. The legal battle centers on procedural challenges raised by Republicans during a recent special legislative session.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline