California GOP members and lawyers outside a federal courthouse, presenting a map and documents in a lawsuit against Proposition 50 over racial gerrymandering claims.
Image generated by AI

California GOP sues to block Proposition 50 congressional map, citing racial gerrymandering

Image generated by AI
Fact checked

California voters approved Proposition 50 on Nov. 4 with about 64% support, temporarily replacing the state’s independent-drawn U.S. House lines with maps passed by the Legislature. On Nov. 5, Republicans sued in federal court, arguing the plan unlawfully uses race and violates the Constitution.

California voters on Tuesday approved Proposition 50, a constitutional amendment that authorizes legislatively drawn congressional maps to be used through 2030, after which the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission regains authority. Backers say the new map could help Democrats flip as many as five U.S. House seats in 2026. (voterguide.sos.ca.gov)

The next morning, the California Republican Party, Assemblymember David Tangipa and 18 voters filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block the maps. The complaint, brought by the Dhillon Law Group in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleges the Legislature and its consultant used race as a predominant factor to favor Latino voters, violating the 14th and 15th Amendments. (apnews.com)

“At a news conference Wednesday, Dhillon Law Group partner Mike Columbo said the plan ‘is designed to favor one race of California voters over others,’ adding, ‘This violates the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law, and the right under the 15th Amendment.’” (abcnews.go.com)

What the maps do for Latino representation is disputed. The lawsuit asserts the plan expands the number of districts where Latino voters can be decisive—from 14 to 16—while citing public statements that the maps were drawn to empower Latino voters. But nonpartisan analyses found the number of majority‑Latino districts largely unchanged at 16, with one additional Latino‑influence district (30%+ CVAP). (dailywire.com)

Mark Meuser, an attorney with the Dhillon firm and the GOP’s 2022 Senate nominee, said plaintiffs will ask a three‑judge panel for emergency relief and argued the state cannot satisfy the Supreme Court’s Gingles test. “We believe the Supreme Court Gingles test cannot be satisfied by the state,” he said. (nbclosangeles.com)

Tangipa condemned the process as diminishing some groups to benefit others. He has described himself as the first Polynesian American elected to the California Legislature. (gvwire.com)

On Election Day, President Donald Trump called Prop. 50 a “GIANT SCAM,” adding that California’s mail‑in ballots were under “very serious legal and criminal review.” He provided no evidence. (politico.com)

Prop. 50’s supporters framed the measure as a counter to Texas’ mid‑decade redistricting, which Republicans said would add up to five GOP‑leaning seats there. California’s map was pitched as a response that could net Democrats a similar number of seats. (apnews.com)

Separately, Rep. Kevin Kiley, a California Republican whose district is affected by the new lines, introduced legislation to ban mid‑decade gerrymandering nationwide. (aspenpublicradio.org)

Related Articles

California GOP officials file lawsuit against voter-approved Prop 50 redistricting outside federal courthouse.
Image generated by AI

California GOP sues to block voter-approved Prop. 50 redistricting

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

California voters approved Proposition 50 this week, clearing the way for new congressional maps backed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and aimed at improving Democrats’ prospects. Within hours, the state Republican Party filed a federal lawsuit to halt the plan, intensifying a broader national fight over mid‑decade redistricting and control of a narrowly divided U.S. House.

California voters approved Proposition 50 on November 4 by roughly 64% to 36%, temporarily replacing commission-drawn congressional districts with a legislature-drawn map through 2030 — a move Democrats say counters GOP mid‑decade redistricting in states like Texas and could net them up to five House seats in 2026.

Reported by AI Fact checked

On November 4, 2025, Californians voted on Proposition 50, a legislative constitutional amendment that would require the state to use new, legislatively drawn congressional maps through 2030 in response to Texas’s mid‑decade redistricting. Backers say the plan answers a Trump‑backed GOP push in Texas; analysts forecast it could shift as many as five U.S. House seats, though the commission would resume control in 2031.

Missouri Democrats and allied groups are racing to qualify a referendum to block a new Republican-drawn congressional map that targets a Democratic-held Kansas City seat and could give the GOP a 7–1 edge in the state’s U.S. House delegation. The campaign must submit roughly 106,000 valid signatures by Dec. 11, 2025, to put the map on hold until voters decide its fate in 2026, amid mounting court fights and a coordinated national redistricting push.

Reported by AI Fact checked

Indiana’s Republican-led Senate has rejected a Trump-backed congressional map that would likely have given the GOP all nine of the state’s U.S. House seats, despite an aggressive months-long pressure campaign from the White House, even as redistricting battles elsewhere and a looming Supreme Court case shape the national landscape.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on October 15, 2025, in Callais v. Louisiana, a case challenging whether creating a second majority-Black congressional district violates the Constitution. Conservative justices appeared inclined to limit Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, potentially allowing Republicans to gain up to 19 House seats. The ruling could reshape minority representation in Congress.

Reported by AI Fact checked

Democrats captured governorships in Virginia and New Jersey, won New York City’s mayoralty, and passed a California redistricting measure on November 4, 2025 — gains analysts linked to affordability-focused campaigns paired with contrasts to President Donald Trump’s agenda.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline