Report warns of coordinated network undermining US energy production

A new report from the American Energy Institute alerts lawmakers to a coordinated activist network aiming to restrict American energy development. The document, sent to Republican leaders this week, details efforts by environmental groups to influence policy and challenge projects. It highlights potential risks to national energy independence amid ongoing political debates.

The American Energy Institute, led by CEO Jason Isaac, distributed an 18-page report and accompanying letter to Republican lawmakers and leaders in Washington, D.C., and across the United States this week. The materials outline what the institute describes as a "small but highly coordinated activist network committed to restricting American energy production." According to the report, this coalition exerts influence through a billion-dollar funding ecosystem, national coordination, and litigation strategies intended to delay U.S. energy projects.

The letter emphasizes that such actions "strengthen America’s rivals by restricting domestic production and limiting our ability to compete on the global stage." Key organizations named include the Union of Concerned Scientists, Sierra Club, and Greenpeace, which the report accuses of opposing fossil fuels and sometimes even nuclear or hydropower initiatives. These groups are said to leverage ties to Democratic politicians, legal actions, protests, and occasional sabotage to counter policies promoting energy expansion, particularly those associated with the Trump administration.

Recent legal setbacks for the network are noted, including a North Dakota jury's verdict earlier this year holding three Greenpeace entities liable for $670 million in damages related to protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The amount was later reduced to $345 million by a judge. The protests, dating back nearly a decade, delayed the pipeline's progress for about ten years and led to criminal charges; for instance, activist Jessica Reznicek received an eight-year federal prison sentence for conspiracy to damage an energy facility.

Despite these challenges, the report warns of renewed efforts aligned with initiatives like the Green New Deal, which Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) described in a 2019 resolution as aiming to "decarbonize the U.S. economy within ten years." Supporters, including the Sierra Club, link the transition to wind and solar with goals of "racial and economic equity" by prioritizing opportunities for minorities. Funding for these campaigns comes from major donors such as the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Arabella Advisors network, Rockefeller network, Tides network, Hewlett Foundation, and Ford Foundation.

The institute portrays these activities as "well-coordinated campaigns funded by donor networks with billions of dollars in resources," posing a threat to U.S. energy independence. It states, "These organizations form a united front with one goal: crippling the American energy industry," warning of broader implications for national policy and competitiveness.

Related Articles

Dutch courtroom scene of Greenpeace's anti-SLAPP lawsuit against Energy Transfer, with Dakota Access Pipeline protest imagery on display.
Image generated by AI

Greenpeace pursues anti-SLAPP case against Energy Transfer in Dutch court

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

Greenpeace International has brought an anti-SLAPP lawsuit against U.S. pipeline company Energy Transfer in the Netherlands, seeking to recover damages it says stem from what it calls abusive litigation over protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The Dutch case follows a North Dakota jury verdict ordering Greenpeace entities to pay more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer over their role in the 2016–2017 protests, a sum later reduced by a judge.

A recent study highlights a worldwide rise in efforts to suppress climate and environmental activism through laws, violence, and vilification. Indigenous land defenders face the highest risks, with over 2,100 such activists killed globally between 2012 and 2023. The report warns that repression will likely intensify under authoritarian policies, including those in the United States.

Reported by AI

One year into Donald Trump's second presidency, his administration has undermined clean energy initiatives, including gutting the Inflation Reduction Act's incentives. However, experts highlight that falling renewable prices and surging electricity demand are propelling the shift to clean energy despite federal obstacles. States and cities continue aggressive emission-reduction efforts, creating tension between policy and economic realities.

The U.S. Department of Energy is pushing to reverse a policy that requires tribal consent for hydropower projects on Indigenous lands. This effort follows the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's denial of permits for proposed pumped-storage facilities on the Navajo Nation. Critics, including tribal leaders and environmental groups, warn that such a change could undermine Indigenous sovereignty and environmental protections.

Reported by AI Fact checked

A report promoted by the conservative-leaning nonprofit Power the Future said natural gas, coal and nuclear plants generated the bulk of U.S. electricity during Winter Storm Fern, while wind and solar output fell during the storm’s coldest, darkest hours. The findings circulated amid the Trump administration’s renewed pushback on wind power, including a December 2025 move to suspend five offshore wind projects on the East Coast.

In an opinion piece, Nathan Lord argues that America cannot lead in artificial intelligence without securing reliable energy sources, particularly natural gas. He highlights China's superior electricity generation and urges building data centers near fuel supplies in regions like the Shale Crescent. Without such measures, the US risks falling behind in the global AI competition.

Reported by AI

Illinois is set to introduce a bill requiring fossil fuel companies to contribute to a climate superfund amid rising costs from global warming. This effort joins a wave of similar legislation in other states, driven by advocates pushing for polluters to cover expenses like flooding and heat waves. New York and Vermont have already enacted such laws, despite opposition from industry and the federal government.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline