Critique highlights flaws in Mbenenge tribunal's neutrality approach

A Judicial Conduct Tribunal has cleared Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge of impeachable conduct in a sexual harassment case, but legal expert Dr Sheena Swemmer argues the report overlooks key constitutional principles on equality and power imbalances.

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal's report, which found Judge President Selby Mbenenge not guilty of impeachable conduct related to allegations of sexual harassment, has drawn sharp criticism for its handling of neutrality, bias, and power dynamics. Dr Sheena Swemmer, head of gender justice at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies at Wits University, contends that the tribunal's framework fails to align with South African constitutional law, particularly sections 9 and 12, which guarantee equality and freedom from violence.

Swemmer notes that the report emphasizes a strict neutrality, rejecting any presumption of bias due to the complainant's junior position as a black woman relative to Mbenenge's senior role. However, she argues this approach ignores the evidentiary burden shift mandated by equality law. Once a prima facie case of sexual harassment is established—a low threshold—the burden moves to the respondent to disprove it on a balance of probabilities. The tribunal, according to Swemmer, did not apply this mechanism, treating the case as one requiring equal starting points despite historical and structural inequalities.

The critique extends to the tribunal's caution against inferring power imbalances from institutional hierarchies. Swemmer emphasizes that constitutional equality demands consideration of systemic gender-based violence affecting black women, imposing positive obligations on the state to address such harms. By detaching the analysis from these contexts, the report risks perpetuating formal rather than substantive equality.

Swemmer suggests that applying the proper lens could have led to a different reading of the evidence, where unresolved doubts would favor the complainant. The decision, she warns, will influence future discussions on sexual harassment in South Africa for years to come.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Courtroom illustration depicting closing arguments in the Mbenenge tribunal, highlighting clashes over sexual harassment allegations.
AI:n luoma kuva

Clash over power and consent marks closing in Mbenenge tribunal

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

In closing arguments at the Judicial Conduct Tribunal on 21 October 2025, advocates clashed over allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge by former court secretary Andiswa Mengo. The tribunal chair, retired Judge Bernard Ngoepe, questioned women's power in relationships, while Mengo's lawyer argued the conduct showed abuse of authority. Judgment has been reserved.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Cases Inquiry will hear oral arguments from former President Jacob Zuma's lawyers on Friday about why Chairperson Justice Sisi Khampepe should step down. Zuma filed for her recusal late last year, arguing her past roles make her unsuitable to lead the commission. His claims include potential conflicts with former colleagues and allegations of improper conduct.

Raportoinut AI

The year 2025 witnessed a major constitutional crisis in Kenya's legal sector, with Chief Justice Martha Koome and other High Court judges facing disciplinary complaints from lawyers Nelson Havi, Ahmednasir Abdullahi, and Raphael Tuju. These complaints have triggered investigations and potential removal proceedings. The dispute highlights tensions between judicial independence and accountability.

The National Prosecuting Authority in Limpopo has welcomed a High Court ruling that dismissed musician Shebe Maburna's urgent bail appeal. Maburna, whose real name is Lehlohonolo Chauke, faces multiple serious charges including attempted murder. The court found no exceptional circumstances to justify his release.

Raportoinut AI

Advocate Hermione Cronje delivered candid critiques of the National Prosecuting Authority during her interview for National Director of Public Prosecutions on December 11. She described a skills catastrophe and institutional dysfunction, emphasizing the need for honest reform. Her forthrightness contrasted with other candidates amid a rushed selection process.

North West Premier Lazarus Mokgosi has denied claims of interfering in a municipal appointment, calling them part of a political smear campaign. He made these statements while testifying before a provincial committee investigating the allegations. The claims stem from a 2023 incident involving a report on a municipal manager's hiring.

Raportoinut AI

Sosialidemokraattinen lautamies korkean profiilin tapauksessa hoitajaa Shakir Mahmoud Shakiria vastaan, joka tuomittiin 100-vuotiaan naisen raiskaamisesta, on keskeytetty ja ilmoitettu poliisille luottamuksellisuuden rikkomisesta julkisella tuomion kritiikillä. Syyttäjä aikoo valittaa neljän vuoden tuomiosta, joka säästi karkotukselta poliittisen raivon keskellä.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää