Critique highlights flaws in Mbenenge tribunal's neutrality approach

A Judicial Conduct Tribunal has cleared Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge of impeachable conduct in a sexual harassment case, but legal expert Dr Sheena Swemmer argues the report overlooks key constitutional principles on equality and power imbalances.

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal's report, which found Judge President Selby Mbenenge not guilty of impeachable conduct related to allegations of sexual harassment, has drawn sharp criticism for its handling of neutrality, bias, and power dynamics. Dr Sheena Swemmer, head of gender justice at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies at Wits University, contends that the tribunal's framework fails to align with South African constitutional law, particularly sections 9 and 12, which guarantee equality and freedom from violence.

Swemmer notes that the report emphasizes a strict neutrality, rejecting any presumption of bias due to the complainant's junior position as a black woman relative to Mbenenge's senior role. However, she argues this approach ignores the evidentiary burden shift mandated by equality law. Once a prima facie case of sexual harassment is established—a low threshold—the burden moves to the respondent to disprove it on a balance of probabilities. The tribunal, according to Swemmer, did not apply this mechanism, treating the case as one requiring equal starting points despite historical and structural inequalities.

The critique extends to the tribunal's caution against inferring power imbalances from institutional hierarchies. Swemmer emphasizes that constitutional equality demands consideration of systemic gender-based violence affecting black women, imposing positive obligations on the state to address such harms. By detaching the analysis from these contexts, the report risks perpetuating formal rather than substantive equality.

Swemmer suggests that applying the proper lens could have led to a different reading of the evidence, where unresolved doubts would favor the complainant. The decision, she warns, will influence future discussions on sexual harassment in South Africa for years to come.

Artikel Terkait

Courtroom illustration depicting closing arguments in the Mbenenge tribunal, highlighting clashes over sexual harassment allegations.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Clash over power and consent marks closing in Mbenenge tribunal

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

In closing arguments at the Judicial Conduct Tribunal on 21 October 2025, advocates clashed over allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge by former court secretary Andiswa Mengo. The tribunal chair, retired Judge Bernard Ngoepe, questioned women's power in relationships, while Mengo's lawyer argued the conduct showed abuse of authority. Judgment has been reserved.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Cases Inquiry will hear oral arguments from former President Jacob Zuma's lawyers on Friday about why Chairperson Justice Sisi Khampepe should step down. Zuma filed for her recusal late last year, arguing her past roles make her unsuitable to lead the commission. His claims include potential conflicts with former colleagues and allegations of improper conduct.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The year 2025 witnessed a major constitutional crisis in Kenya's legal sector, with Chief Justice Martha Koome and other High Court judges facing disciplinary complaints from lawyers Nelson Havi, Ahmednasir Abdullahi, and Raphael Tuju. These complaints have triggered investigations and potential removal proceedings. The dispute highlights tensions between judicial independence and accountability.

Advocate Hermione Cronje delivered candid critiques of the National Prosecuting Authority during her interview for National Director of Public Prosecutions on December 11. She described a skills catastrophe and institutional dysfunction, emphasizing the need for honest reform. Her forthrightness contrasted with other candidates amid a rushed selection process.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Testimony at the Madlanga Commission has highlighted serious flaws in the South African Police Service's forensic laboratory, according to security analyst Professor Jacob Mofokeng. A senior analyst admitted to errors in a key ballistic report that could have undermined a murder investigation. The revelations point to systemic problems like high workloads contributing to unresolved criminal cases.

A Social Democratic lay judge in the high-profile case against care worker Shakir Mahmoud Shakir, convicted of raping a 100-year-old woman, has been suspended and reported to police for breaching confidentiality by publicly criticizing the verdict. The prosecutor plans to appeal the four-year sentence, which spared deportation despite political outrage.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Kenya’s Supreme Court has dismissed former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s application to halt his impeachment proceedings in the High Court. The unanimous ruling came from a five-judge bench. This allows the case to proceed without interference.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak