Critique highlights flaws in Mbenenge tribunal's neutrality approach

A Judicial Conduct Tribunal has cleared Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge of impeachable conduct in a sexual harassment case, but legal expert Dr Sheena Swemmer argues the report overlooks key constitutional principles on equality and power imbalances.

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal's report, which found Judge President Selby Mbenenge not guilty of impeachable conduct related to allegations of sexual harassment, has drawn sharp criticism for its handling of neutrality, bias, and power dynamics. Dr Sheena Swemmer, head of gender justice at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies at Wits University, contends that the tribunal's framework fails to align with South African constitutional law, particularly sections 9 and 12, which guarantee equality and freedom from violence.

Swemmer notes that the report emphasizes a strict neutrality, rejecting any presumption of bias due to the complainant's junior position as a black woman relative to Mbenenge's senior role. However, she argues this approach ignores the evidentiary burden shift mandated by equality law. Once a prima facie case of sexual harassment is established—a low threshold—the burden moves to the respondent to disprove it on a balance of probabilities. The tribunal, according to Swemmer, did not apply this mechanism, treating the case as one requiring equal starting points despite historical and structural inequalities.

The critique extends to the tribunal's caution against inferring power imbalances from institutional hierarchies. Swemmer emphasizes that constitutional equality demands consideration of systemic gender-based violence affecting black women, imposing positive obligations on the state to address such harms. By detaching the analysis from these contexts, the report risks perpetuating formal rather than substantive equality.

Swemmer suggests that applying the proper lens could have led to a different reading of the evidence, where unresolved doubts would favor the complainant. The decision, she warns, will influence future discussions on sexual harassment in South Africa for years to come.

Articoli correlati

Courtroom illustration depicting closing arguments in the Mbenenge tribunal, highlighting clashes over sexual harassment allegations.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Clash over power and consent marks closing in Mbenenge tribunal

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

In closing arguments at the Judicial Conduct Tribunal on 21 October 2025, advocates clashed over allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge by former court secretary Andiswa Mengo. The tribunal chair, retired Judge Bernard Ngoepe, questioned women's power in relationships, while Mengo's lawyer argued the conduct showed abuse of authority. Judgment has been reserved.

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal has ruled that Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge is not guilty of gross misconduct but is guilty of serious misconduct under Category B. This finding means he avoids impeachment but faces potential sanctions from the Judicial Service Commission. The commission will now review submissions before deciding on guilt and penalties.

Riportato dall'IA

Former South African presidents Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma have filed a court challenge to remove retired judge Sisi Khampepe from heading an inquiry into delays in Truth and Reconciliation Commission prosecutions. The move targets alleged political interference in apartheid-era cases and raises questions about judicial impartiality. President Cyril Ramaphosa has stated he will abide by the court's decision.

The legal counsel for suspended Gauteng DPP Andrew Chauke has criticized NPA head Shamila Batohi for failing to exercise due diligence in a 2010 murder case. Advocate Thembeka Ngcukaitobi highlighted overlooked evidence in the acquittal of a police officer accused of killing a teenager. Batohi acknowledged unawareness of key reports but pledged further investigation.

Riportato dall'IA

Retired Justice Bess Nkabinde has postponed the Nkabinde Inquiry until Thursday to address concerns over Advocate Shamila Batohi's legal representation. The delay stems from Batohi's request for personal counsel, which was denied state funding, prompting her to seek help from the new National Director of Public Prosecutions. The inquiry is examining the fitness of suspended South Gauteng Director Andrew Chauke.

The Khampepe Commission has heard testimony on the 1983 kidnapping and torture of anti-apartheid activist Nokuthula Simelane, whose case was stalled by political decisions. Investigator Andrew Leask detailed how security police officers were linked to her death, but prosecutions were halted by orders from former justice minister Brigitte Mabandla. Interference from police commissioner Jackie Selebi further obstructed efforts to bring suspects to trial.

Riportato dall'IA

A female prosecutor in Japan has called for a third-party committee to investigate harassment among prosecution staff nationwide after alleging sexual assault by a senior colleague. She submitted a written request to the Justice Ministry on Monday and stated she would resign if the requested measures are not implemented by the end of March.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta