U.S. senators presenting a bipartisan bill to combat sports streaming piracy at Capitol Hill, symbolizing legal action against illegal streams amid rising costs for fans.
AI:n luoma kuva

Lawmakers unveil bipartisan draft to curb sports‑streaming piracy

AI:n luoma kuva
Faktatarkistettu

U.S. senators have unveiled a bipartisan discussion draft aimed at stopping websites that illegally stream sports, empowering copyright holders to seek federal court orders blocking foreign piracy sites. The push comes as some fans say rising subscription costs are driving them to illicit streams.

The rising price of cable and streaming packages has pushed some sports fans toward illegal streams, prompting a fresh effort in Congress. Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California is promoting the Block Bad Electronic Art and Recording Distributors Act — the Block BEARD Act — a bipartisan framework he is advancing with Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware and Republican Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee. The senators announced a discussion draft on July 31, 2025, that would let copyright holders ask U.S. federal courts to order internet providers to block foreign websites dedicated to piracy.

“This is an effort to allow copyright holders to go to court and say, hey, this is my property. And this foreign site is predominantly in the business of theft,” Schiff said. Coons framed the issue as a consumer‑security risk: “Maybe you do get a chance to watch the Eagles for free or to see the latest movie you want to watch. But what you're also doing is opening the front door to all of your data, your finances, your web‑browsing history,” he said.

For Philadelphia Eagles fan Dai Nixon, a podcaster in Charlotte, N.C., cost is the driver. He said he pays about $83 a month for YouTube TV but turns to the free site NFLBITE when the games he wants aren’t available on sanctioned platforms. “We have to purchase these different subscriptions just to keep up with our favorite sports teams, which is, you know, kind of ridiculous,” Nixon said. “I'm not going to, you know, kick out over 300, 350 bucks annually just to watch them every week when I can do the same thing for not that price.”

About one in three NFL fans watched at least some games on illegal platforms in 2023, according to a survey by Oddspedia. Mike Smith, a professor of information technology and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University, said current U.S. law makes enforcement difficult: “There's just not much they can do to shut down these sites.” Earlier this year, authorities — working with Egyptian law enforcement after a yearlong investigation — announced the shutdown of StreamEast, a major live‑sports piracy network; similar sites quickly reappeared.

Smith’s research on site‑blocking efforts abroad finds that when governments block access to multiple piracy sites, consumers are more likely to shift to paid legal services. “Just blocking access to the site from within the country increases people's likelihood to pay for legal content,” he said, summarizing work that measured a 7%–12% increase in use of legal services when multiple sites were blocked.

Nixon shrugged off concerns about either data theft or harm to rights holders. If his preferred site is blocked, he said, “Every system can be finessed, just ask the president. So it may be a bump in the road, but the road is still there.”

The senators say they hope to release a bicameral version with House allies by year’s end. NPR said it sought comment from websites that pirate NFL games; none responded.

Editor’s note: While lawmakers are describing the Block BEARD Act as bipartisan legislation, it is currently a Senate discussion draft rather than a formally introduced, numbered bill.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Senator Bill Hagerty and GOP colleagues at a press conference introducing legislation to curb foreign money in ballot campaigns and voter drives.
AI:n luoma kuva

Hagerty, GOP colleagues move to curb foreign money in ballot campaigns, voter drives

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva Faktatarkistettu

Sen. Bill Hagerty has reintroduced legislation to expand the federal ban on foreign-national political spending to cover ballot measures, voter registration, ballot collection and other get-out-the-vote activities. Election-integrity advocacy groups Americans for Public Trust and the Honest Elections Project back the effort.

The streaming bill was approved in the Chamber of Deputies in early November and now awaits Senate review, where significant changes are possible. The proposal imposes a tax on platforms' revenues to support national audiovisual production, but voting is expected only in February 2026. Experts debate whether it will raise subscription prices or boost Brazilian content.

Raportoinut AI

A Republican state senator in Utah has introduced a bill to impose a 7 percent tax on pornography sites operating in the state, aiming to fund mental health services for teenagers. The proposal comes amid a wave of age-verification laws across the US, with critics arguing the tax violates the First Amendment. If enacted, the measure would take effect in May and include an annual fee for adult sites.

U.S. senators from both parties met on January 6, 2026, to restart negotiations on a bill establishing a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, amid mounting pressures from a looming government shutdown deadline. Republicans presented a 'closing offer' to Democrats, proposing over 30 revisions, as Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott plans a markup on January 15. Key sticking points include ethics standards and limits on crypto yields competing with traditional banks.

Raportoinut AI Faktatarkistettu

Five Wisconsin Republican lawmakers this week unveiled a six-bill package to curb foreign adversary influence in state government and higher education, with a focus on China. The measures would restrict university partnerships and state contracts, tighten rules on telecom gear, protect genetic data, limit coverage for transplants tied to forced organ harvesting, and strengthen penalties for transnational repression.

The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission has expressed concerns about Netflix's proposed $83 billion acquisition of Warner Bros., citing potential issues in the streaming market. However, the FCC lacks authority to review the deal. Regulators including the Justice Department and FTC are examining it for antitrust implications.

Raportoinut AI

Building on yesterday's State Department announcement, visa restrictions target five Europeans accused of coercing U.S. tech platforms into censoring American speech. New details highlight their organizations' roles in digital regulation, while Europe decries the move as an attack on sovereignty.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää