M.P. High Court to start Bhojshala mosque dispute hearings from April 6

The Madhya Pradesh High Court announced on April 2 that it will commence regular hearings on the Bhojshala temple-Kamal Maula mosque dispute cases in Dhar from April 6. The decision follows the Supreme Court's refusal on April 1 to intervene in a Muslim side petition, directing the High Court to address all parties' objections.

A Division Bench of Justices Vijay Kumar Shukla and Alok Awasthi in Indore issued the order on April 2, noting the Supreme Court's observations from April 1 on an appeal by the Maulana Kamaluddin Welfare Society representing the Muslim community.

The Supreme Court directed the High Court to consider objections from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)’s scientific survey report, videography, and photographs in line with natural justice principles. The High Court fixed hearings from April 6 at 2.30 p.m., referencing prior orders dated January 22, 2026, and March 11, 2024.

The ASI’s nearly 2,200-page report states the existing structure was built over pre-existing temple ruins from the 10th-11th century Paramara period, with remnants still in situ. Hindu petitioners expressed satisfaction, while the Muslim side alleged ignored objections.

The site is an ASI-protected 11th-century monument. A 2003 agreement allows Hindus to conduct puja on Tuesdays and Muslims to offer namaz on Fridays. The court also gave government authorities two weeks to respond to a plea claiming a Jain temple and gurukul at the site.

Liittyvät artikkelit

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
AI:n luoma kuva

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

The Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday reserved its order in the Bhojshala case after hearing arguments over the religious character of the disputed site in Dhar.

Raportoinut AI

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that individuals do not need permission from authorities to hold religious prayer meetings at home if no law is violated. It quashed police notices against petitioners from Janjgir-Champa district and directed officials not to interfere with their civil rights.

Raportoinut AI

The Delhi Gymkhana Club has urged the Union government not to disrupt its operations until there is clarity on alternate land allotment. The move follows a government notice to vacate its 27.3-acre premises by June 5. The Delhi High Court is scheduled to hear a related plea today.

The Supreme Court has quashed a criminal case pending trial in Prayagraj since 1991, stressing that quick justice is essential under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Raportoinut AI

The Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to freeze West Bengal's voter rolls and publish the supplementary list by midnight after noting that adjudication of claims from voters deleted during the Special Intensive Revision was nearly complete. The court refused to set a deadline for appellate tribunals, stressing the need to freeze the lists now.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää