M.P. High Court to start Bhojshala mosque dispute hearings from April 6

The Madhya Pradesh High Court announced on April 2 that it will commence regular hearings on the Bhojshala temple-Kamal Maula mosque dispute cases in Dhar from April 6. The decision follows the Supreme Court's refusal on April 1 to intervene in a Muslim side petition, directing the High Court to address all parties' objections.

A Division Bench of Justices Vijay Kumar Shukla and Alok Awasthi in Indore issued the order on April 2, noting the Supreme Court's observations from April 1 on an appeal by the Maulana Kamaluddin Welfare Society representing the Muslim community.

The Supreme Court directed the High Court to consider objections from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)’s scientific survey report, videography, and photographs in line with natural justice principles. The High Court fixed hearings from April 6 at 2.30 p.m., referencing prior orders dated January 22, 2026, and March 11, 2024.

The ASI’s nearly 2,200-page report states the existing structure was built over pre-existing temple ruins from the 10th-11th century Paramara period, with remnants still in situ. Hindu petitioners expressed satisfaction, while the Muslim side alleged ignored objections.

The site is an ASI-protected 11th-century monument. A 2003 agreement allows Hindus to conduct puja on Tuesdays and Muslims to offer namaz on Fridays. The court also gave government authorities two weeks to respond to a plea claiming a Jain temple and gurukul at the site.

관련 기사

Clashes injure Delhi police during MCD anti-encroachment drive near Turkman Gate mosque, with tear gas and stone-pelting in pre-dawn chaos.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Clashes injure five Delhi police during MCD anti-encroachment drive near Turkman Gate mosque

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

A pre-dawn demolition drive by Delhi's Municipal Corporation on January 7, 2026, near the historic Faiz-e-Ilahi Mosque in Turkman Gate sparked clashes, with stone pelters injuring five officers. Police used minimal force including tear gas to restore order, while officials confirmed the mosque remained untouched amid a court-ordered clearance of encroachments.

Officials from the Tamil Nadu Archaeology Department surveyed a contested stone pillar at Thiruparankundram hill on December 10, amid legal disputes over lighting the Karthigai Deepam near a dargah. Justice S Srimathy of the Madras High Court Madurai Bench allowed a regulated hunger strike by local residents on December 13 to press for the ritual. The survey has drawn objections, with petitioners arguing it generates new evidence while the matter remains sub judice.

AI에 의해 보고됨

A nine-judge Supreme Court bench stated on Wednesday that courts cannot hollow out religion in the name of reform and logic may not be the right tool to examine faith and belief systems. The remarks came on the second day of hearing a reference from the 2018 Sabarimala judgment. The Centre disagreed on courts deciding religious practices as superstition.

The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that individuals do not need permission from authorities to hold religious prayer meetings at home if no law is violated. It quashed police notices against petitioners from Janjgir-Champa district and directed officials not to interfere with their civil rights.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has informed the Bombay High Court that Savarkar Sadan, the former residence of Hindutva ideologue Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, cannot be declared a centrally protected monument of national importance as it is less than 100 years old. The ASI suggested it could be protected at the state level instead. This statement came in an affidavit responding to a public interest litigation aimed at preventing the building's demolition.

The Jharkhand High Court has directed the state government to file a detailed affidavit clarifying whether mandatory judicial inquiries were conducted in nearly 450 custodial deaths reported between 2018 and 2025. This order came during a hearing on a public interest litigation filed in 2022. The court emphasized the need to ensure compliance with legal safeguards to rule out foul play.

AI에 의해 보고됨

India's Supreme Court has agreed to consider a plea by Sanatani Sangsad highlighting violence in West Bengal after the 2021 state polls. The application seeks a high-level monitoring committee chaired by a retired Supreme Court judge to oversee the state's law and order machinery. The bench directed the petitioner to implead the CBI as a party.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부