Javier ‘N’ and José Luis ‘N’, former Sedatu directors, have denounced the forgery of their signatures in key documents from the Estafa Maestra investigation. An FGR expert analysis confirmed the irregularity, but the prosecution closed the case without proper justification. The affected parties are seeking amparos to protect their rights.
The controversy arose when Javier ‘N’, former director in Sedatu's Coordination of Delegations, detected that his signature was forged on the delivery-reception act for works linked to the Universidad Politécnica de Quintana Roo. He initiated investigation file FED/CDMX/SPE/0006740/2022 for signature forgery. An official graphoscopy expert analysis by the Fiscalía General de la República (FGR) confirmed that the signature does not belong to him.
José Luis ‘N’, former director of Strategic Projects, reported a similar irregularity in his case and requested a comparable expert analysis, but has received no response, hindering his access to justice. This evidence was the FGR's main proof to charge them with an alleged diversion of over 77 million pesos in criminal case 172/2022. Despite the confirmed falsehood, Judge Luis Benítez denied the dismissal, forcing the defense to seek an amparo.
The FGR pulled the forgery complaint into the same unit accusing them, the Fiscalía de Asuntos Relevantes. In December 2025, it decided not to exercise criminal action, closing the investigation with anomalies: email notifications that the defense never received, without receipt of delivery, and without justifying the closure despite the expert analysis showing documentary fraud.
Since 2023, prosecutor Mario Bulmaro Fonseca allegedly tried to hide the document and the expert report. In response, Javier ‘N’ and José Luis ‘N’ have launched legal actions in 2026: amparo proceeding 22/2026, with a hearing on March 3; a request for a control hearing to make the FGR account for ignored evidence, pending since December 2025; and a complaint to Internal Affairs on February 6, 2026, against involved public servants.
The case questions the FGR's integrity in Estafa Maestra investigations, where the use of apocryphal documents to sustain accusations is alleged. Emilio Zebadúa is mentioned as a key figure in the case, who has acknowledged offenses but has not faced prison, unlike other implicated individuals like Rosario Robles.
