Illustration of Americans showing reluctance for personal carbon fees but support for taxing corporate emissions, based on recent polls.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

Polls show limited appetite for personal carbon fees as more Americans favor charging companies

Larawang ginawa ng AI
Fact checked

Americans’ willingness to pay a personal carbon fee remains modest: an AP-NORC/EPIC survey in 2023 found 38% would pay $1 per month, down from 52% in 2021, while a 2024 follow-up shows continued reluctance at higher amounts and broader support for taxing corporate emissions.

The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) reported in an April 11, 2023 release that 38% of U.S. adults would support paying a $1 monthly carbon fee on their household energy use, a decline of 14 percentage points from 52% in 2021. Support falls as the fee rises: roughly three in ten would pay $10, $20, or $40 per month, and about one in five would pay $75 or $100. (epic.uchicago.edu)

Newer AP-NORC/EPIC polling in 2024 finds the public still balks at higher personal fees, but shows greater support for making companies pay. In that survey, 58% said they support a tax that companies must pay on the carbon they emit. By comparison, willingness to pay larger monthly household fees remained markedly lower. (apnorc.org)

The 2024 poll also asked who bears responsibility for addressing climate change. Majorities said corporations and industry (62%) and the U.S. federal government (59%) have a great deal or a lot of responsibility. Far fewer—41%—said the same of individual people. In 2019, half of Americans (50%) assigned a great deal or a lot of responsibility to individuals, indicating a measurable decline over time. (apnorc.org)

Context from the same polling series helps explain shifting views. After dipping in 2023, the share of Americans who say climate change (for those who believe it is happening) is caused mostly or entirely by human activities rebounded to 54% in 2024, up from 49% in 2023. (apnorc.org)

The debate has played out alongside prominent political rhetoric. In 2019, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D‑N.Y.) warned at an MLK Day event that “the world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change,” a line that drew widespread attention and subsequent pushback from scientists who objected to the framing. (realclearpolitics.com) That same year, then–presidential candidate Kamala Harris unveiled a climate platform built around $10 trillion in public and private investment over a decade. (cnbc.com)

Taken together, the AP-NORC/EPIC findings point to a persistent gap between acknowledging climate risks and accepting new personal costs to address them, even as many Americans favor policies that hold corporations and government more accountable. (apnorc.org)

Mga Kaugnay na Artikulo

Illustration depicting an American family struggling with affordability crisis, checking bills amid sparse groceries and skipped healthcare, based on POLITICO poll.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

Poll reveals widespread American struggles with affordability

Iniulat ng AI Larawang ginawa ng AI Fact checked

A new POLITICO poll highlights intense financial pressures on Americans, with nearly half saying it is hard to afford essentials such as groceries, housing and health care. The survey, conducted in November, points to broad impacts on daily life, including people skipping medical care and cutting back on leisure spending, even as many voters remain skeptical of President Donald Trump’s claims that prices are falling.

A recent National Bureau of Economic Research report reveals that American families face $400 to $900 in yearly climate-related expenses. These costs stem from extreme weather events impacting insurance, energy, taxes, and health. The study highlights rising burdens, especially in disaster-prone areas.

Iniulat ng AI

A new study indicates that the United States will need both green subsidies and carbon pricing to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. While subsidies can initially reduce emissions, they alone are insufficient without eventual taxes on carbon. Inconsistent policies across administrations could make the transition slower and more costly.

A new Politico poll conducted with research firm Public First finds that many Americans, including a notable share of Donald Trump’s 2024 voters, are holding the president responsible for the nation’s affordability crisis. Nearly half of respondents describe the cost of living as the worst they can remember, with groceries, housing and health care emerging as the top pain points — a warning sign for Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Iniulat ng AI

Starting January 1, 2026, France implements a range of measures impacting personal finances, housing, transport, and the environment, amid the lack of an adopted state budget. Key adjustments include a 0.9% increase in basic pensions, the suspension of the MaPrimeRénov’ scheme, and price rises for gas and postal packages.

One year into his second term, President Donald Trump aggressively dismantled environmental protections and boosted fossil fuels, slowing U.S. clean energy momentum. However, many actions rely on reversible executive orders amid legal pushback and market-driven renewable growth, limiting their long-term effects.

Iniulat ng AI

Federal support for family caregivers remains stalled, but state-level initiatives are gaining traction to ease the burden on millions of Americans. In a recent Senate speech, New Jersey Democrat Andy Kim highlighted the personal and financial toll of caregiving for his father with Alzheimer's. Advocates point to growing awareness and policy experiments as signs of potential national change.

 

 

 

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan