Tribunals deny lack of benefits for judges and appeals judges

A retired judge stated in an STF session that first-instance judges lack cars, health plans, or snacks, but various tribunals across the country denied the claim, confirming aids such as food vouchers, health support, and official vehicles. The statement was made during discussions on restrictions to indemnatory funds for magistrates. The judgment was adjourned to the end of March.

In a Supreme Federal Court (STF) session on Wednesday (25), Claudia Marcia de Carvalho Soares, representing the Brazilian Association of Labor Magistrates (ABMT), defended penduricalhos, extra indemnatory funds paid to judges, claiming precarious conditions for the category. "A first-instance judge has no car, pays fuel out of pocket, has no functional apartment, no health plan, no cafeteria, no water, and no coffee. An appeals judge has almost nothing, except a car, barely has a snack," said Soares, a retired judge from the 1st Region Labor Court who received over R$ 700,000 in net income in 2025, with nearly R$ 300,000 in October, November, and December.

The judgment, discussing the limitation of these funds following decisions by ministers Flávio Dino and Gilmar Mendes, was adjourned to the end of March. In response to Folha de S.Paulo, which contacted 27 State Justice Tribunals, six Federal Regional Tribunals, and 24 Labor Regional Tribunals, several courts confirmed benefits for magistrates.

The Superior Council of Labor Justice (CSJT) stated that the standard is to provide cars for second-degree magistrates, with individualized service in larger tribunals, plus snacks during morning and afternoon sessions and health plans or medical reimbursement. The Rio Grande do Norte State Justice Tribunal (TJ-RN) offers a R$ 2,000 food voucher and health aid from R$ 1,200 to R$ 1,900, with vehicles for appeals judges. In Rio Grande do Sul (TJ-RS), there is food aid, health, and childcare, plus snacks for appeals judges on judgment days, with cars limited to the president, vice presidents, and chief inspector.

The Minas Gerais State Justice Tribunal (TJ-MG) provides health, food, and childcare aids, with the option of car and driver for appeals judges in functional activities. The São Paulo State Justice Tribunal (TJ-SP) has health aid with reimbursement of proven medical expenses up to a limit. The Santa Catarina State Justice Tribunal (TJ-SC) limits benefits to those set by the National Justice Council (CNJ), with vehicles for work travel.

On the other hand, the Mato Grosso State Justice Tribunal (TJ-MT) and Roraima (TJ-RR) stated they do not pay such benefits beyond legal remuneration. The Rio de Janeiro State Justice Tribunal (TJ-RJ) provides armored institutional vehicles to appeals judges and health plans. The Federal District and Territories Justice Tribunal (TJDFT) and Amazonas (TJ-AM) did not detail the aids.

According to Transparência Brasil, indemnities and gratuities often violate the constitutional ceiling, with most magistrates receiving above the limit, especially in lower and intermediate instances. Vitor Rhein Schirato, a USP administrative law professor, called Soares' statement "absurd," questioning why judges wouldn't cover costs like in other professions.

Mga Kaugnay na Artikulo

Justice Flávio Dino symbolically suspending extra government benefits across Brazil's executive, legislative, and judicial branches amid salary hike controversy.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

Minister Dino suspends extra benefits across three powers

Iniulat ng AI Larawang ginawa ng AI

Supreme Court Justice Flávio Dino ordered the suspension of extra benefits known as penduricalhos across Brazil's three branches of government, with a 60-day review period. The ruling aims to curb supersalaries that evade the constitutional cap of R$ 46,366.19. Meanwhile, Congress approved salary hikes and new perks for its staff, costing at least R$ 650 million yearly.

At least one Justice servers' entity, a retired prosecutor and a retired judge voiced support for Minister Flávio Dino's STF decision suspending indemnatory payments created by administrative acts. The São Paulo Court of Justice opposes the measure and quadrupled extras to desembargadores in two years. The case heads to plenary on Wednesday (25).

Iniulat ng AI

Following Minister Flávio Dino's February monocratic suspension of certain extra payments—which drew support from retirees and entities but opposition from courts like TJ-SP—Brazil's Supreme Federal Court (STF) on March 25 approved Dino's transitional rules capping 'penduricalhos' at 35% of the R$ 46,366.19 constitutional subsidy for judiciary and public prosecutors, until national legislation. The decision bans perks like 'auxílio-peru' and projects R$ 7.3 billion in annual savings.

A judge from the 12th Federal Court in São Paulo has provisionally suspended the effects of President Lula's decree altering the Worker Food Program (PAT) rules, in response to a lawsuit by operator Ticket S.A. The ruling prohibits the Union from inspecting or penalizing the company for non-compliance with the new regulations. The decision applies only to Ticket, which seeks legal certainty in the sector.

Iniulat ng AI

TSE President Minister Cármen Lúcia announced ten ethical conduct guidelines for Regional Electoral Court (TRE) magistrates during the opening of the 2026 Electoral Judiciary Year. She stressed the need for transparency and strictness against ethical deviations amid general elections set for October. Electoral Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet warned of risks from the misuse of artificial intelligence in campaigns.

São Paulo's Court of Justice second instance reversed, on Thursday 19, the condemnation of iFood Benefícios, Caju, Flash, and Swille for unfair competition in the meal voucher sector. The lawsuit was filed by the Brazilian Workers' Benefits Association (ABBT), representing Alelo, Ticket Edenred, and VR. The ruling states there was no explicit ban on open arrangements before the deadline.

Iniulat ng AI

The nine ministers of Mexico's Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN) have decided not to use the recently acquired Jeep Cherokee vehicles and will return them, following controversy over their cost. If they cannot be returned, they will be assigned to judges facing higher security risks. The move underscores a commitment to austerity in public resource use.

 

 

 

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan