Umpire awards Indian Wells match to Hijikata after hindrance call

Italy's Luciano Darderi faced a stunning defeat in the second round of the Indian Wells Open when the chair umpire ended his match against Australia's Rinky Hijikata due to a bizarre hindrance ruling. Darderi stopped play on match point, claiming crowd interference, but officials awarded the point to Hijikata after video review. The decision sparked immediate backlash from the crowd and online commentators.

The incident occurred on March 8, 2026, during the second round at the Indian Wells Open. Darderi trailed 4-6, 6-2, 5-4, 40-15 against Hijikata, the Australian qualifier. Under pressure, Darderi hit a defensive lob and pointed toward the crowd before halting mid-rally. Hijikata, advancing to finish the point, appeared confused as the chair umpire stopped play.

Officials reviewed video footage, applying the sport's hindrance rule. They found no evidence that Hijikata or his team caused the disruption, ruling that Darderi hindered the point by stopping. The umpire explained to Darderi that players cannot halt a rally due to crowd shouts, and the review confirmed the interference. At the net, Darderi told Hijikata that someone had called out, but Hijikata denied it. Broadcast audio captured a spectator's voice reacting as Darderi returned the ball, though the exact words were unclear.

The crowd voiced loud disapproval, and social media filled with criticism, including a tweet from user SK describing the drama: "Darderi was facing match point against him when he stopped the point, claiming that someone had spoken. After checking it on the VAR, they called hindrance and he lost the match." Many questioned the judgment, noting the rule focuses on video evidence rather than a player's belief or intention.

This event highlights ongoing debates about hindrance in tennis, where technology like video review aids accuracy but struggles with subjective calls. Similar controversies include Aryna Sabalenka's point loss at the Australian Open semifinal against Elina Svitolina for a mishit forehand, unrelated to her grunting, and Daniel Altmaier's shout of "no, no!" at the Rio Open, which cost him a point against Dušan Lajović despite a winning drop shot. Such cases underscore calls for clearer rules to safeguard the game's integrity.

Mga Kaugnay na Artikulo

Jessica Pegula criticized a new tennis rule allowing video reviews of hindrances after points conclude, following a controversial call in Jack Draper's Indian Wells Open quarterfinal against Daniil Medvedev. The American player described the rule as 'stupid' during a podcast appearance. The incident has prompted debate and ATP Tour adjustments.

Iniulat ng AI

Daniil Medvedev advanced to the semifinals of the BNP Paribas Open with a 6-1, 7-5 victory over Jack Draper, marked by a disputed hindrance call. The incident occurred during a crucial rally in the second set, where Draper's gesture led to the point being awarded to Medvedev after a video review. Both players addressed the controversy post-match, with Draper maintaining it did not sufficiently distract his opponent.

Nick Kyrgios appeared to lose a potential win at the MGM Slam in Las Vegas due to a chair umpire's scoring mistake during his match against Alexander Bublik. The error occurred in a 10-point tiebreak, where Kyrgios led 9-7 but the score was called 8-8, leading to his defeat. Brazilian teenager Joao Fonseca won the $1 million exhibition tournament.

Iniulat ng AI

Seventeen-year-old Deividas Bandzevicius was disqualified from an ITF J60 first-round match despite defeating Emiliano Bratomi 6-4, 4-6, 7-6(5). After sealing victory in the deciding tiebreak, Bandzevicius tossed his racket into the air, sending it flying toward his opponent. Officials ruled the action as physical abuse under ITF regulations, overriding the scoreboard result.

 

 

 

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan