Umpire awards Indian Wells match to Hijikata after hindrance call

Italy's Luciano Darderi faced a stunning defeat in the second round of the Indian Wells Open when the chair umpire ended his match against Australia's Rinky Hijikata due to a bizarre hindrance ruling. Darderi stopped play on match point, claiming crowd interference, but officials awarded the point to Hijikata after video review. The decision sparked immediate backlash from the crowd and online commentators.

The incident occurred on March 8, 2026, during the second round at the Indian Wells Open. Darderi trailed 4-6, 6-2, 5-4, 40-15 against Hijikata, the Australian qualifier. Under pressure, Darderi hit a defensive lob and pointed toward the crowd before halting mid-rally. Hijikata, advancing to finish the point, appeared confused as the chair umpire stopped play.

Officials reviewed video footage, applying the sport's hindrance rule. They found no evidence that Hijikata or his team caused the disruption, ruling that Darderi hindered the point by stopping. The umpire explained to Darderi that players cannot halt a rally due to crowd shouts, and the review confirmed the interference. At the net, Darderi told Hijikata that someone had called out, but Hijikata denied it. Broadcast audio captured a spectator's voice reacting as Darderi returned the ball, though the exact words were unclear.

The crowd voiced loud disapproval, and social media filled with criticism, including a tweet from user SK describing the drama: "Darderi was facing match point against him when he stopped the point, claiming that someone had spoken. After checking it on the VAR, they called hindrance and he lost the match." Many questioned the judgment, noting the rule focuses on video evidence rather than a player's belief or intention.

This event highlights ongoing debates about hindrance in tennis, where technology like video review aids accuracy but struggles with subjective calls. Similar controversies include Aryna Sabalenka's point loss at the Australian Open semifinal against Elina Svitolina for a mishit forehand, unrelated to her grunting, and Daniel Altmaier's shout of "no, no!" at the Rio Open, which cost him a point against Dušan Lajović despite a winning drop shot. Such cases underscore calls for clearer rules to safeguard the game's integrity.

Mga Kaugnay na Artikulo

Moez Echargui argued with the chair umpire after a disputed call during his first-round match at the Lincoln Challenger. The fourth seed lost to qualifier Dhakshineswar Suresh after the incident in the deciding tiebreak.

Iniulat ng AI

Jakub Mensik defeated Mariano Navone in a grueling second-round match at the French Open but afterward criticized the chair umpire for time-violation calls that disrupted his rhythm while cramping in extreme heat.

Jannik Sinner defeated Jan-Lennard Struff in straight sets at Wimbledon to advance to the semifinals. The match featured an unusual moment when a ball fell from Struff's pocket during a rally, prompting a let call from the umpire.

Iniulat ng AI

American tennis player Tristan Boyer lost his temper during a second-round qualifying match at the Francavilla Challenger, striking the umpire’s chair with his racket after receiving a game penalty. The incident handed victory to Italy’s Daniele Rapagnetta at 4-6, 5-6. This outburst echoes a similar meltdown by Boyer last season.

 

 

 

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan