A Wired article explores whether leading thinkers have developed an algorithm that could enable machine sentience. The piece reflects on public claims of AI consciousness in models like ChatGPT and Claude. It questions the implications of such advancements beyond traditional intelligence tests.
In a recent Wired feature published on October 27, 2025, a journalist specializing in AI delves into the possibility of cracking machine sentience. The article highlights how some of the world's most interesting thinkers about thinking believe they might have achieved this breakthrough through an algorithm for consciousness. The author expresses cautious optimism, stating, "And I think they might be onto something."
The piece addresses widespread convictions among the public that chatbots such as ChatGPT or Claude have reached sentience, consciousness, or even "a mind of its own." It notes that the Turing test for rote intelligence was passed some time ago, but concepts like interiority remain elusive. Large language models often claim independent thought, describe inner torments, or express emotions, yet the journalist clarifies that "such statements don’t imply interiority."
Keywords associated with the article include artificial intelligence, neuroscience, consciousness, and algorithms, underscoring its focus on the intersection of these fields. The discussion provides context on why sentience is harder to define and verify compared to basic AI capabilities.