Authors share conversion therapy experiences after supreme court ruling

Kamis, 07 Mei 2026

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Two writers have released books exploring the lasting effects of conversion therapy amid ongoing debates following a March supreme court decision. Davin Malasarn and Timothy Schraeder Rodriguez discuss their personal stories in a recent conversation. Their works highlight the intersection of faith, family, and queer identity.

In March the supreme court ruled that Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy violated first amendment rights by discriminating against therapist Kaley Chiles. The decision has renewed attention to these practices, which a 2026 Trevor Project report found affected one in twenty LGBTQIA+ young people despite various state bans.

Mahkamah Agung batasi pelarangan terapi konversi di Colorado melalui putusan 8-1

Selasa, 31 Maret 2026 Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Mahkamah Agung AS pada hari Selasa memutuskan dengan suara 8-1 bahwa larangan di Colorado bagi konselor berlisensi untuk mencoba mengubah orientasi seksual atau identitas gender anak di bawah umur melalui terapi bicara memerlukan pengawasan ketat berdasarkan Amendemen Pertama. Keputusan dalam kasus Chiles v. Salazar, yang ditulis oleh Hakim Neil Gorsuch, mengembalikan kasus tersebut ke pengadilan yang lebih rendah setelah menemukan adanya diskriminasi sudut pandang. Hakim Ketanji Brown Jackson menjadi satu-satunya pihak yang menyatakan perbedaan pendapat, dengan memperingatkan adanya risiko luas terhadap regulasi medis.

Queer books industry faces strain from censorship efforts

Authors, agents and publishers report increasing difficulties in producing and selling queer books for young readers. Five years of rising challenges have led to reduced acquisitions and sales drops. A national bill targeting transgender topics recently advanced in Congress.

Rajasthan high court expunges remarks on transgender amendment act

Jumat, 03 April 2026 Dilaporkan oleh AI

The Rajasthan High Court has removed portions of its March 30 judgment criticizing the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, stating they were included by mistake. In an April 2 clarificatory order, the bench said the observations were neither intended nor necessary. The case stemmed from a petition by a transgender woman in the Rajasthan Police.

19 Juni 2026 03.35

Pemerintahan Trump angkat kekhawatiran diskriminasi agama dengan MLB setelah peringatan topi Pride Night

30 Mei 2026 05.35

Masa persidangan Mahkamah Agung mendekati akhir dengan sejumlah kasus penting yang masih tertunda

14 Mei 2026 06.18

Penulis asal Wisconsin mengatakan dia melihat teman sekelasnya mengadopsi nama baru dan memulai transisi gender medis saat SMA

07 Mei 2026 07.52

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

22 April 2026 13.35