Författare delar erfarenheter av omvändelseterapi efter högsta domstolens dom

7 maj 2026

Rapporterad av AI

Två författare har gett ut böcker som utforskar de långvariga effekterna av omvändelseterapi mitt under pågående debatter efter ett domslut i högsta domstolen i mars. Davin Malasarn och Timothy Schraeder Rodriguez diskuterar sina personliga historier i ett nyligen genomfört samtal. Deras verk belyser skärningspunkten mellan tro, familj och hbtq-identitet.

I mars slog högsta domstolen fast att Colorados förbud mot omvändelseterapi stred mot det första författningstillägget genom att diskriminera terapeuten Kaley Chiles. Domen har förnyat uppmärksamheten kring dessa metoder, som enligt en rapport från The Trevor Project från 2026 påverkade en av tjugo hbtqia+-ungdomar trots olika statliga förbud.

Relaterade artiklar

Symbolic illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court 8-1 ruling limiting Colorado's conversion therapy ban, featuring scales of justice and First Amendment elements.

Supreme Court limits Colorado conversion therapy ban in 8-1 ruling

31 mars 2026 Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The US Supreme Court ruled 8-1 on Tuesday that Colorado's ban on licensed counselors attempting to change a minor's sexual orientation or gender identity through talk therapy requires strict First Amendment scrutiny. The decision in Chiles v. Salazar, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, remands the case to lower courts after finding viewpoint discrimination. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented alone, warning of broad risks to medical regulations.

Queer books industry faces strain from censorship efforts

Authors, agents and publishers report increasing difficulties in producing and selling queer books for young readers. Five years of rising challenges have led to reduced acquisitions and sales drops. A national bill targeting transgender topics recently advanced in Congress.

Rajasthan high court expunges remarks on transgender amendment act

3 april 2026 Rapporterad av AI

The Rajasthan High Court has removed portions of its March 30 judgment criticizing the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, stating they were included by mistake. In an April 2 clarificatory order, the bench said the observations were neither intended nor necessary. The case stemmed from a petition by a transgender woman in the Rajasthan Police.

19 juni 2026 03:35

Författare delar erfarenheter av omvändelseterapi efter högsta domstolens dom

Relaterade artiklar

Supreme Court limits Colorado conversion therapy ban in 8-1 ruling

Queer books industry faces strain from censorship efforts

Rajasthan high court expunges remarks on transgender amendment act

Trump administration raises religious-discrimination concerns with MLB after Pride Night cap warnings

Supreme Court term nears end with key cases pending

Wisconsin writer says she saw classmates adopt new names and begin medical gender transitions during high school

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Supreme Court signals case-by-case approach in faith disputes

Denna webbplats använder cookies