Former Trump lawyer joins bar complaint against DOJ attorney in deportation case

Lawyers Defending American Democracy, joined by former White House lawyer Ty Cobb, filed an ethics complaint with the D.C. Bar against DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign. The group accuses Ensign of making false statements to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg during a hearing on Alien Enemies Act deportations. The complaint stems from a mid-March 2025 emergency order that the government allegedly ignored.

On Tuesday, Lawyers Defending American Democracy (LDAD) submitted a complaint to the D.C. Bar seeking discipline against Drew Ensign for a pattern of misconduct in immigration cases. The filing highlights Ensign's responses during a Saturday emergency hearing before Chief Judge James Boasberg, who ordered the Trump administration to halt deportations of 252 Venezuelans alleged to be gang members under the Alien Enemies Act and return any planes in the air. Ensign stated he did not know if flights would take off within 48 hours and lacked additional details, claims the complaint deems knowingly false. LDAD asserts Ensign attended a meeting the previous day where then-Acting Assistant Attorney General Emil Bove declared planes would depart 'no matter what.' Before the hearing resumed, Ensign received an email from plaintiffs' counsel citing public flight reports of imminent deportations but failed to correct his statements to the court. Judge Boasberg responded by initiating a contempt probe, which remains paused after the D.C. Circuit halted scheduled testimony from Ensign and former DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni. Reuveni, fired in April 2025 after refusing to misrepresent facts in another case, corroborated details of the defiant meeting. LDAD chair Scott Harshbarger, former Massachusetts attorney general, emphasized that every lawyer, including government ones, must tell the truth to uphold the justice system. Ty Cobb, who served as White House special counsel during Trump's first term on the Mueller probe, joined the complaint, stating government attorneys' ethical obligations are 'even more sacred' and accountability is vital for public confidence.

Articoli correlati

DOJ attorney presenting proposed rule to pause state bar probes on ethics complaints, with symbolic scales and the DOJ headquarters in the background.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Justice Department proposes pre-review process for state bar complaints against DOJ lawyers

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA Verificato

The U.S. Justice Department has proposed a regulation that would require state bar authorities to pause investigative steps against current or former DOJ attorneys for alleged ethics violations tied to their federal duties while the department conducts its own review. The proposal, published as a notice of proposed rulemaking on March 5, 2026, cites the McDade Amendment as its legal basis and says the change is needed amid what it describes as increasingly politicized bar complaints.

Almost two months after unveiling a proposed rule on March 5 to let the attorney general review ethics complaints against DOJ attorneys before state bar action, the Justice Department faces intensifying debate. With Pam Bondi out as attorney general and Todd Blanche acting in the role, officials cite rising politically motivated filings—citing cases involving Bondi, Ed Martin and Drew Ensign—while critics decry it as undermining state oversight and the McDade-Murtha Amendment.

Riportato dall'IA

Ed Martin, serving as U.S. pardon attorney in the Trump administration, has been accused of ethical violations for threatening sanctions against Georgetown University Law Center over its diversity programs. The D.C. Bar's disciplinary counsel also alleges he improperly pressured judges to interfere with an investigation into his conduct. These claims stem from a complaint by a retired California judge.

The US Department of Justice has appealed a district court's dismissal of criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. The appeal centers on the validity of interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan's appointment and Attorney General Pam Bondi's retroactive ratification of her actions. The DOJ argues that any flaws were harmless and do not warrant dismissal.

Riportato dall'IA

The Trump administration has brought new indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and the Southern Poverty Law Center as part of what critics describe as a revenge campaign against political enemies. These charges follow previous efforts targeting figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James. Prosecutors have used broad federal statutes and grand jury powers in these cases.

Colin McDonald, President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead a newly proposed Justice Department unit focused on fraud in federally funded programs, told senators he would pursue cases “without fear or favor” as Democrats questioned whether the initiative could blur lines between the White House and prosecutorial decision-making.

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta