DOJ moves to block Missouri lawsuit on abortion pill mailing

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion on Friday to halt or dismiss a lawsuit by Missouri and other Republican-led states challenging the FDA's policy allowing mifepristone to be shipped through the mail. The filing argues that proceeding with the case would interfere with an ongoing FDA safety review of the drug initiated by the Trump administration. Pro-life advocates have criticized the move, urging stricter regulations on medication abortion.

The lawsuit, Missouri v. FDA, was brought by Missouri, Kansas, and Idaho to block a COVID-era policy that relaxed regulations for dispensing mifepristone, enabling online prescriptions and mail delivery without in-person doctor visits. The Justice Department contends that the states lack sufficient standing to sue, as they can still enforce their pro-life laws against out-of-state prescribers. In its filing, the DOJ stated, “Missouri, Kansas, and Idaho are not the only plaintiffs to have challenged the current conditions of use for mifepristone. Given this widespread debate over the safety of mifepristone, FDA has concluded that the best path forward is for the agency to undertake its review based on all the evidence before the agency.”

The department requested that the court stay the lawsuit or dismiss it while the FDA completes its review of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for mifepristone. This review was initiated last year by FDA Administrator Marty Makary and Health and Human Services Director Robert F. Kennedy Jr., though it has not yet been released. A DOJ spokesman explained, “In this filing, the Department of Justice requested more time from the court for the FDA to complete its review of mifepristone REMS. As the Supreme Court recognized in a unanimous ruling less than two years ago, it is the role of the FDA – not the federal courts – to evaluate drug safety data and impose appropriate precautions.”

The policy, implemented early in the Biden administration citing COVID-19, has led to increased medication abortions in states with bans, such as Texas, where data indicate tens of thousands of such procedures occur annually via shipped pills. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sought penalties against providers, but states like New York have refused cooperation due to shield laws. The filing echoes a January motion opposing a similar request from Louisiana.

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser condemned the DOJ action, stating, “The pro-life movement has very simple demands. There should be no place on the market for drugs meant to poison and kill innocent human beings – but at the very least, this administration can and should take them out of the mail. This is no more or less than the policy of the first Trump administration.” The DOJ affirmed its commitment to President Trump’s pro-life agenda, including protections for advocates and pregnancy centers. Reports highlight risks, including a case in Texas where a father allegedly forced mifepristone on his partner, resulting in the stillbirth of a baby named Presley Mae.

관련 기사

Dramatic courtroom scene of Fifth Circuit judges issuing nationwide block on telehealth mifepristone prescribing and mailing.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Fifth Circuit temporarily blocks telehealth prescribing and mailing of mifepristone nationwide

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지 사실 확인됨

A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Friday issued a temporary nationwide order that freezes federal rules allowing mifepristone to be prescribed via telemedicine and sent by mail, siding with Louisiana in a lawsuit challenging the FDA’s 2023 changes.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday issued an emergency order permitting the mail distribution of the abortion drug mifepristone to continue nationwide. The unsigned ruling temporarily blocked a federal appeals court decision that had struck down a Biden-era policy allowing online prescriptions and shipments.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The Supreme Court is addressing challenges to medication abortion rules.

The U.S. Justice Department has proposed a regulation that would require state bar authorities to pause investigative steps against current or former DOJ attorneys for alleged ethics violations tied to their federal duties while the department conducts its own review. The proposal, published as a notice of proposed rulemaking on March 5, 2026, cites the McDade Amendment as its legal basis and says the change is needed amid what it describes as increasingly politicized bar complaints.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Almost two months after unveiling a proposed rule on March 5 to let the attorney general review ethics complaints against DOJ attorneys before state bar action, the Justice Department faces intensifying debate. With Pam Bondi out as attorney general and Todd Blanche acting in the role, officials cite rising politically motivated filings—citing cases involving Bondi, Ed Martin and Drew Ensign—while critics decry it as undermining state oversight and the McDade-Murtha Amendment.

The US Department of Justice has appealed a district court's dismissal of criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. The appeal centers on the validity of interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan's appointment and Attorney General Pam Bondi's retroactive ratification of her actions. The DOJ argues that any flaws were harmless and do not warrant dismissal.

AI에 의해 보고됨

US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday restricting mail-in ballots to voters on state-approved lists. The federal government must create a list of eligible citizens. Democrats criticize the move as potentially unconstitutional.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부