Spotify wins dismissal of bot-farming lawsuit

A federal judge has dismissed a class-action lawsuit accusing Spotify of ignoring bot-farming on its platform. The suit was led by rapper RBX and focused heavily on streams for Drake.

California federal judge Josephine Stanton dismissed the case in a June 22 ruling. She found that RBX failed to show the harm outweighed Spotify's reasons for its streaming policies.

The complaint claimed Spotify was negligent and violated California's Unfair Competition Law. Stanton ruled that the suit did not prove Spotify had a duty to stop artificial streaming.

The lawsuit centered on Drake, noting that a non-trivial share of his 37 billion streams came from bot accounts. It argued this practice cost other artists hundreds of millions of dollars in royalties.

RBX plans to file an amended complaint within 20 days. Drake filed a separate 2024 lawsuit against Spotify and Universal Music Group over alleged stream manipulation involving Kendrick Lamar.

관련 기사

Illustration of a federal jury dismissing Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI in court.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Jury dismisses Musk lawsuit against OpenAI as untimely

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

A federal jury ruled Monday that Elon Musk waited too long to sue OpenAI and its leaders. The decision ended the high-profile case after three weeks of testimony.

Elon Musk's X has invoked a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to argue that music publishers' copyright infringement claims against it should be dismissed. The platform contends the ruling rejects the theory of contributory liability alleged in the suit. Publishers disagree but agreed to pause discovery while briefing the issue.

AI에 의해 보고됨

A US District Judge has dismissed with prejudice X's antitrust lawsuit claiming advertisers colluded to boycott the platform. Judge Jane Boyle ruled that X failed to show consumer harm required for an antitrust claim. The decision comes after advertisers pulled ads citing concerns over content moderation on X.

Juries in California and New Mexico last week held Meta and Alphabet's YouTube liable for harms to young users, awarding a total of over $381 million in damages. The cases targeted platform features rather than third-party content, challenging long-standing Section 230 protections. Company lawyers have vowed to appeal the rulings.

AI에 의해 보고됨

A US appeals court has warned that lawyers may face sanctions after submitting an appeal filled with fictitious quotations generated by artificial intelligence. The case involved an attempt to force Meta to remove a critical post from a dating safety group on Facebook.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부