Supreme Court orders rebranding of Manoj Bajpayee's Netflix film

India's Supreme Court has directed filmmakers to change the title of Manoj Bajpayee's upcoming Netflix movie 'Ghuskhor Pandit' due to concerns over community sentiments. The court emphasized limits on freedom of expression to avoid insulting any group. A petition from the Brahmin Samaj of India prompted the legal action.

The controversy surrounding the title 'Ghuskhor Pandit' arose shortly after the film's announcement, with critics arguing that the word 'Pandit' negatively portrays a specific community. A petition filed by Atul Mishra, secretary of the Brahmin Samaj of India, claimed the title hurts sentiments and could fuel social tensions, seeking a ban on the film's release and streaming.

During a hearing, a bench led by Justice B.V. Nagarathna reprimanded the producers, including director Neeraj Pandey, stating, "It is wrong to insult any class. There is already so much division in society. Do not encourage this." The court observed that such titles are often selected for publicity and to generate controversy. It further noted, "We support freedom of expression. But you should know that this freedom is bound by certain limits."

The judges highlighted constitutional provisions under Article 19(2), which restrict speech that harms national security, morality, law and order, and extended this to include social harmony. "How can we sit idle when there are so many rifts in society?" the court remarked.

Representatives for the producers informed the Supreme Court that the Delhi High Court had previously addressed similar petitions, where the team agreed to alter the title, leading to a suspension of proceedings there. The filmmakers confirmed they had removed the trailer from social media and begun the rebranding process. The Supreme Court sought details on the proposed new name and whether the content offends any community, scheduling the next hearing for February 19.

This development underscores ongoing debates about artistic freedom versus community sensitivities in Indian cinema.

관련 기사

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a public interest litigation seeking to halt the release of Ritesh Deshmukh's film Raja Shivaji. The court found it did not serve public interest. The film will release in Hindi and Marathi on May 1.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The Delhi High Court issued notice to the makers of Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy on a petition by actor Salman Khan seeking to restrain the film's release over alleged infringement of his personality rights.

A nine-judge Supreme Court bench stated on Wednesday that courts cannot hollow out religion in the name of reform and logic may not be the right tool to examine faith and belief systems. The remarks came on the second day of hearing a reference from the 2018 Sabarimala judgment. The Centre disagreed on courts deciding religious practices as superstition.

AI에 의해 보고됨

A Mumbai sessions court ordered the release of Aniruddha Vijaykumar in a POCSO case after identifying lapses in his arrest. The court determined that the grounds of arrest were not conveyed in a language he understood and directed the investigating officer to explain the oversight.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부