House justice committee examines substance of Marcos impeachment complaints

The House justice committee ruled on Monday that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, the panel will assess if they hold sufficient substance. If approved, the process will advance to notify Marcos.

On Monday, February 2, 2026, the House justice committee, chaired by Rep. Gerville Luistro, voted that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. The complaint filed by private lawyer Andre de Jesus passed 46-1, with one abstention. The Makabayan bloc's complaint, led by former congresswoman Liza Maza, passed 35-9, with one abstention.

Rep. Bienvenido Abante was the sole dissenter, arguing the complaints lacked form and wasted public funds. Rep. Rufus Rodriguez questioned the Makabayan complaint's verification due to missing notarization, but the vote proceeded after confirming both followed the same format.

On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at 10 a.m., the committee resumes to evaluate the complaints' substance, including allegations of corruption in public works projects, budget irregularities, enabling former President Rodrigo Duterte's arrest and transfer to The Hague, and claims of drug addiction in Jett Nisay's endorsement. If approved, this would initiate the first impeachment proceeding of the 20th Congress, notifying Marcos to respond.

Rep. Ysabel Maria Zamora stated the recent Supreme Court ruling on Vice President Sara Duterte's case has no effect, as these complaints were filed by ordinary citizens and endorsed by House members, unlike Duterte's. Reps. Luistro and Keith Flores agreed. House Senior Deputy Majority Leader Lorenz Defensor emphasized the House is not bound by SC rulings on impeachment rules due to separation of powers, following the 1987 Constitution's intent instead.

Constitutional framer Rene Sarmiento criticized the SC decision as judicial overreach that hinders future impeachments. From Malacañang, Presidential Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro said Marcos committed no impeachable offense but is concerned about economic impacts. 'He did nothing wrong, but it will affect the whole country,' she said.

Связанные статьи

Supreme Court building with VP Sara Duterte and lawyers celebrating impeachment dismissal ruling.
Изображение, созданное ИИ

Supreme Court upholds dismissal of VP Sara's first impeachment

Сообщено ИИ Изображение, созданное ИИ

The Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Sara Duterte's first impeachment case is unconstitutional due to violations of the one-year bar rule and due process. It clarified that new complaints can now be filed immediately. Duterte's lawyers are prepared for potential future proceedings.

The House justice committee has dismissed two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. for lacking substance. Dwight de Leon explains in a Rappler Recap what happens next and whether the decision can be reversed.

Сообщено ИИ

Unlike complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte, the impeachment complaint against President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. was sent to the House speaker's office just two days after filing. House Secretary General Cheloy Velicaria-Garafil confirmed this on January 21. The swift transmission raises questions about whether it benefits the president against future complaints.

The House of Representatives is ready to receive and act on any impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte starting February 6, public accounts committee chair Terry Ridon said. This follows the Supreme Court's decision clarifying notice requirements for the express route of impeachment filing. The court's one-year bar rule against Duterte lapses on that date.

Сообщено ИИ

The Supreme Court has reshaped how future impeachment cases will be initiated and assessed by ruling Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment unconstitutional. In its July 25, 2025 decision, the high court cited the House’s inaction and lack of due process as grounds for voiding it. It also laid down new standards for impeachments going forward.

In a shifting political landscape, President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. faces attempts to destabilize his administration, but structural changes make removal unlikely without constitutional processes. Economic stability and institutional reforms have neutralized traditional paths to ouster like military intervention or mass protests. Impeachment remains the only viable mechanism, though it faces significant hurdles in the current Congress.

Сообщено ИИ

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. underwent a major cabinet shake-up last week amid a corruption scandal involving flood control projects. Officials like Lucas Bersamin and Amenah Pangandaman were forced to resign or were fired, as political tensions escalate with drug allegations against the Marcos family. These developments highlight a deepening crisis challenging his leadership.

 

 

 

Этот сайт использует куки

Мы используем куки для анализа, чтобы улучшить наш сайт. Прочитайте нашу политику конфиденциальности для дополнительной информации.
Отклонить